Covid-19 and Life

TELLS YOU ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW:​

World Economic Forum Drops Twitter – Promotes Chinese State-Controlled Social Media Apps Instead

​

Anal Schwab’s World Economic Forum noticeably omitted Twitter as a source to follow its actions at its upcoming 2023 event. Instead, Chinese apps were recommended instead.

The World Economic Forum appears to have joined the cancel Twitter campaign, promoting Chinese state-controlled social media apps to push the Davos agenda.

The WEF recommends following along through a handful of social media sites. They include the U.S.-based narrative-compliant Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube, along with the Chi Com social media apps TikTok, WeChat, and Weibo.

Anal Schwab currently has 40 full time staffers at his office in China.

See:
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1607544613060870144

https://dossier.substack.com/p/world-economic-forum-cancels-twitter?utm_source=twitter&sd=pf

 

VACCINE LIES EXPOSED BY AUSSIE SENATOR
​

• In an early-December 2022 Parliamentary speech, Gerard Rennick, Senator for Queensland, Australia, reviewed some of the lies told by members of Parliament and the Department of Health about the Chinese Coronavirus jabs;
• By September 2022 Australia had logged more than 10 million Chinese Coronavirus cases, even though 20 million of Australia’s total population of 26 million had received their Chinese Coronavirus jabs;
• In 2021, Australia had 8,706 extra deaths above norm, even though New South Wales remained in lockdown for three months, so, in theory, the death toll should have been lower, not higher;
• Australia has logged 140,000 Chinese Coronavirus jab injuries — more than all the injuries reported from vaccines since 1971 — yet the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) refuses to look at or acknowledge the safety signals. Chief health officers also admit not reading key science documents that detail COVID jab hazards; and
• Waning effectiveness is the justification for repeated boosters, but artificially inflated antibodies caused by repeated boosters signal to your body that you’re chronically infected, and the resulting immune response may end up accelerating the development of autoimmune conditions such as Parkinson’s, Kawasaki disease and multiple sclerosis.

See:
https://media.mercola.com/ImageServ...australian-senator-against-covid-jabs-pdf.pdf

 

This is a look at All Cause US Deaths by Age Group

It includes all causes of death, including Covid 19. It reinforces information presented prior, that Covid 19 adversely affected the elderly much more than the young.

I combined mortality information from the CDC with population data from the Census Bureau.



This shows total annual deaths each year, and the increase caused by Covid 19.


Here I have examined the mortality rate as a percentage of each age group's portion of the US population. Persons 85 years of age and older are a small percentage of the population, and the mortality rate is quite high as a result, even before Covid 19.






Here I present information on deaths of those less than 65 years if age. The mortality rate for this age group was typically less than one percent of the total US population prior to Covid 19.



Here I look at excess death for 2020-2022 based on average deaths 2015-2019. As with other charts, the number of deaths was increasing from 2015 to 2019, which is why 2015 deaths are negative. Data for 2020-2022 is incomplete, with data 2022 not being for the full year.






This chart shows excess deaths for those under the age of 65.

 

​

 

Please don't believe the Epoch Times.

 

Molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 in samples collected from patients with morbilliform eruptions since late 2019 in Lombardy, northern Italy

Abstract

As a reference laboratory for measles and rubella surveillance in Lombardy, we evaluated the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and measles-like syndromes, providing preliminary evidence for undetected early circulation of SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 435 samples from 156 cases were investigated. RNA from oropharyngeal swabs (N = 148) and urine (N = 141) was screened with four hemi-nested PCRs and molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection was found in 13 subjects. Two of the positive patients were from the pandemic period (2/12, 16.7%, March 2020–March 2021) and 11 were from the pre-pandemic period (11/44, 25%, August 2019–February 2020). Sera (N = 146) were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies. Five of the RNA-positive individuals also had detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. No strong evidence of infection was found in samples collected between August 2018 and July 2019 from 100 patients. The earliest sample with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was from September 12, 2019, and the positive patient was also positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG and IgM). Mutations typical of B.1 strains previously reported to have emerged in January 2020 (C3037T, C14408T, and A23403G), were identified in samples collected as early as October 2019 in Lombardy. One of these mutations (C14408T) was also identified among sequences downloaded from public databases that were obtained by others from samples collected in Brazil in November 2019. We conclude that a SARS-CoV-2 progenitor capable of producing a measles-like syndrome may have emerged in late June-late July 2019 and that viruses with mutations characterizing B.1 strain may have been spreading globally before the first Wuhan outbreak. Our findings should be complemented by high-throughput sequencing to obtain additional sequence information. We highlight the importance of retrospective surveillance studies in understanding the early dynamics of COVID-19 spread and we encourage other groups to perform retrospective investigations to seek confirmatory proofs of early SARS-CoV-2 circulation.​

How many strains were active in those early days, and were they equally contagious and deadly?

We have to wonder about the origins of the virus. We don't know anything about the people who had Covid in September 2019. It has only been mentioned the outbreak was associated with Chinese migrants. Lombardy is one region with a large number of Chinese immigrants.

The early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Lombardy, Italy

Background: In the night of February 20, 2020, the first epidemic of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outside Asia was uncovered by the identification of its first patient in Lombardy region, Italy. In the following weeks, Lombardy experienced a sudden increase in the number of ascertained infections and strict measures were imposed to contain the epidemic spread.

...

Conclusions: At the time of first case notification, COVID-19 was already widespread in the entire Lombardy region. This may explain the large number of critical cases experienced by this region in a very short timeframe. The slight decrease of the reproduction number observed in the early days after February 20, 2020 might be due to increased population awareness and early interventions implemented before the regional lockdown imposed on March 8, 2020.

​

Of course: China suggests Italy may be the birthplace of COVID-19 pandemic

 

I wouldn't believe any "news" source without verifying their story. The Epoch Times caters to a demographic, the same as most news sources. They all "tailor" the news to meet their audience's expectations, to sell advertising. Most people live in echo chambers, that support their own believes, not challenge them.

Of course, most of us don't have first hand knowledge of subjects, and really don't know what is actually true and what isn't.

One big issue today is censorship by omission.

 

​

 

Oh, But Of Course .... You MUST believe The New York Slimes:

“All The News That’s Fit To Wrap Dead Fish In”​

 

That's the equivalent of tossing a fish into a shroud and dumping it in pauper's field, covered in lime.
Tragic even for fish, to be associated with the Slimes.

 

Hmm ...What Do The Chi Coms Know That We Don’t?​

Guess what? The Chi Coms have ZERO casualties from the experimental mRNA gene therapy jabs.

As of August, 2021, The Chi Coms have administered 2 billion Coronavirus vaccine shots in the country. BUT ... not a single person in China was given a mRNA Coronavirus vaccine. …

More than 1 billion people worldwide have received more than 2 billion jabs of mRNA. None are in China ...

As of December 12, 2022, the Chi Coms STILL haven’t allowed their own people to be injected with the experimental gene-editing mRNA “vaccines.

As of December 12, 2022, the Communist Chinese STILL haven’t allowed their own people to be injected with the experimental gene-editing mRNA “vaccines.”

But ... the Chi Coms have finally approved an mRNA Coronavirus vaccine (BioNTech) ... BUT .... only for German nationals living in China.

Not a single citizen of China or a single member of its military has been injected with mRNA.

Welcome to Unrestricted Warfare ... Chi Com Style!


See:
https://dcweekly.org/2022/02/10/wha...-vaccine-to-any-of-its-1-45-billion-citizens/

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/27/china/2-billion-covid-vaccines-mic-intl-hnk/index.html

https://news.yahoo.com/china-finally-approves-mrna-covid-065627541.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

 

​

See:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-activism/the-case-for-wearing-masks-forever

 

​

 

** DR. JOHN IS NOT HAPPY **​

Based upon a new analysis of “Events of Special Interest” associated with the Pfi$er and Moderna Clot Shots, the excess risk of serious adverse events found in the study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analysis of the mRNA Clot Shots.

Dr. John relates how in 1976 the Swine Flu vaccine was stopped when it was discovered that that there was 1 additional case of Guillan-Barre Syndrome for every 100,000 people that were vaccinated, and that in 1999 the Rotavirus vaccine was stopped when it was discovered that there were 1-2 cases of Intussusception (folding of the bowel) for every 10,000 infants who were vaccinated. YET ....

THERE IS 1 SERIOUS EVENT PER 800 PEOPLE WHO ARE VACCINATED WITH THE CLOT SHOT!
and
THE CLOT SHOT HAS NOT BEEN WITHDRAWN AND INSTEAD IS OFFICIALLY PROMOTED!​

 

​

 

SO SORRY CHAIRMAN XI:
UK Joins The Club: Announces Chinese Coronavirus Restrictions On Arrivals From China
​

The UK government has announced it will follow other countries by requiring travellers from China to provide a negative Chinese Coronavirus test beginning January 5th.

There are no direct flights from China to Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland, but the government said it would be working with the devolved administrations to ensure measures are implemented across the UK.

See:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/uk-an...rrivals-for-fear-or-new-variants_4954289.html
​

 

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

First, lets acknowledge the small print, which the media seldom does, looking for eye catching headlines.

"Our study has several important limitations."

...

"A fifth important limitation is our lack of access to individual participant data, which forced us to use a conservative adjustment to the standard errors."

...​

"Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, as we approach 2 years after release of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level data remain inaccessible."​

The study authors' "conclusion," as presented in the abstract:

"Discussion
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets."
​

They acknowledge the limitations of their study and say scientists need access to the original raw data from the vaccine studies so they can do formal and more accurate analysis.

We don't know what the result of those studies would be.

This is part of the "scientific process." They raise a red flag and present evidence in support of further study.

They acknowledge that other scientists may find fault with their methodology and results.


The authors of this study performed "Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults.."

They basically re-crunched the available numbers using criteria first agreed upon early in the vaccine development process, though subsequently modified.

"In March 2020, the Brighton Collaboration and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations partnership, Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC), created and subsequently updated a “priority list of potential adverse events of special interest relevant to COVID-19 vaccine trials.”

...

"The Brighton Collaboration is a global authority on the topic of vaccine safety and in May 2020, the World Health Organization’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety endorsed and recommended the reporting of AESIs based on this priority list."​

Using their methodology, they identified increased risk of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs).

"A risk ratio of 1 means that the risk is the same for each participant. A risk ratio greater than 1 indicates increased risk; a ratio less than 1 indicates less risk."​

Of interest is the increased risk of "Coagulation disorder" and "Other forms of acute cardiac injury".'





I agree it is long past due for the original data to be released, as doing so is part of the normal scientific process. The FDA and government are standing in the way of science, and are as a result basically controlling "The Science."

There is serious conflict of interest involved, namely the pharmaceutical industry basically controls, monetarily, much of the government and the media.

 

I'm sure falsified documents can be easily bought or simply printed out by air travelers.

Dr John Campbell DOES NOT recommend suspending flights, testing everyone, or quarantine.





Access Video on Rumble

 

COVID-19 primary series and booster vaccination and immune imprinting


This study examined cases where people in Qatar were infected with the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 at least twice. They looked specially at the REINFECTION rate of omicron.

Some of the people studied had received only the two initial vaccine doses, some had received an additional single booster dose, and some were not vaccinated at all, but all contracted omicron; some more than once.

As we know, being vaccinated didn't prevent people from contracting omicron variants of Covid-19, in some cases more than once.

My interpretation: The rate of reinfection for those who received three vaccine doses was the same as for the unvaccinated, long term. (See the third chart below)

More people were non-symptomatic than symptomatic. “SARS-CoV-2 testing in Qatar is done at mass scale, mostly for routine reasons.”

While a large number of people were infected with omicron, regardless of vaccine status, a small percentage were REINFECTED with omicron.

Their conclusion:

Conclusions: History of primary-series vaccination enhanced immune protection against omicron reinfection, but history of booster vaccination compromised protection against omicron reinfection. These findings do not undermine the short-term public health utility of booster vaccination.​

Study Population 1:

Out of 872,491 individuals who had been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2:

190,268 had received the initial two dose vaccine AND had been diagnosed with omicron​

573 had been reinfected with omicron​

41 PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections​

133 PCR-confirmed non-symptomatic infections​

151,619 were not vaccinated AND had been diagnosed with omicron​

1,044 had been reinfected with omicron​

47 PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections​

286 PCR-confirmed non-symptomatic infections​

Study Population 2:

Out of 872,491 individuals who had been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2:

42,024 had received the initial three dose vaccine AND had been diagnosed with omicron​

480 had been reinfected with omicron​

28 PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections​

86 PCR-confirmed non-symptomatic infections​

226,335 had received the initial two dose vaccine AND had been diagnosed with omicron​

248 had been reinfected with omicron​

10 PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections​

50 PCR-confirmed non-symptomatic infections​

Study Population 3:

Out of 872,491 individuals who had been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2:

42,024 had received the initial three dose vaccine AND had been diagnosed with omicron​

337 had been reinfected with omicron​

21 PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections​

64 PCR-confirmed non-symptomatic infections​

151,619 were not vaccinated AND had been diagnosed with omicron​

323 had been reinfected with omicron​

23 PCR-confirmed symptomatic infections​

86 PCR-confirmed non-symptomatic infections
​

These charts suggest having two doses of the vaccine is better than NOT being vaccinated, in the long term. That having two doses of the vaccine is better than three doses, in the long term. That there is no long term advantage to three doses of the vaccine over being unvaccinated. The study indicates there is a possible long term disadvantage to three doses of the vaccine, caused by vaccine imprinting, perhaps only in some individuals.




What immune imprinting means for the future of COVID-19 vaccines

"While many of us will be able to stage an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 that we would not have been able to 2 years or even 1 year ago, the individual response may vary considerably between people, depending on the nature of previous exposure.

This phenomenon is known as immune imprinting, Prof. Danny Altmann, professor of immunology at Imperial College London explained to Medical News Today in an interview:

“All those things push and pull your immune repertoire, your antibodies and things in different directions, and make you respond differently to the next vaccine that comes along […] So that’s what’s called immune imprinting.”​

Dr Malone has taken some heat in the media for bringing up the subject of immune imprinting.

Dr. Malone Warns of Immune Imprinting After Fauci Floats Second Booster Shots

“I couldn’t design a vaccine if I wanted to, to be more likely to drive immune imprinting,” Malone, who helped invent the messenger RNA technology the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are built on, told The Epoch Times.

...

Researchers with Imperial College London and the United Kingdom Health Security Agency found that people who received three doses of a COVID-19 vaccine and were infected with the Wuhan strain had a lower level of protection against later strains when compared to people who had not been infected. Other groups, including researchers with the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, have found the vaccines much less effective against Omicron subvariants than the Wuhan strain.​

 

​

 

The last meme is hard hitting. We can fully expect a HUGE deluge of propaganda to explain away the adverse events and deaths.

What will be their theme?

Blame the “unvaxxed”?
Keep making up syndromes?
Release a new bio weapon?
Start a war? (Oops, already started)
Keep deleting data?

 

Please don't take at face value anything a random guy on Twitter named CatTurd says.

 

Who SHOULD we take at face value?