Servitude

Findom has become a heavily misunderstood kink from all sides. It has been heaverly tainted by a large number of lazy, rip off, scamming, heartless pretend to be dommes who have destroyed its reputation.

At it's purest form it is simply giving up some control over the financial aspect of your life to someone else. There are genuine findoms out there who actually take the kink very seriously respecting your financial needs and actually encourage you to make better financial decisions. They would most likely take a cut of what they help you earn but they would properly budget for all your needs setting you up so you are completely self sustainable. They would simply be slightly more dominating financial advisors.

I can see the rush this would give some people and why they would enjoy it but I (like most people) could never give over that much power away even though it could help remove a lot of daily stress.

You always have options in life with a dominant and with the financial conveyer belt life appears to force you through. Your decisions carry different consequences depending on how you choose to comply.

As I see it the big differences between a findom and financial institutions is one has us all blind to the power they really have and they benifit from having the full weight of the law on there side with much tighter, enforceable contracts.

 

What you're consistently missing here is that there are other parties involved besides just you.
Hate to break it to you, but the world does not revolve around whatever you happen to feel like at a given time.
All standard debt arrangements incorporate clauses whereby either party can terminate under certain conditions. There will more than likely be penalties for doing so however, and rightly so.
If you voluntarily enter into an agreement with another party then at a later date just decide you want to to walk away, there is an impact on the counterparty, so it's only right you should be penalised for choosing that option.

I believe the concept is known as honouring ones obligations.

If you continually take on obligations and fail to honour them, then subsequent new obligations will cost you more, and penalties for breaking them will be harsher, because you are rightly deemed a higher risk.

As previously stated debt is a tool. If you abuse it there are consequences.

All perfectly reasonable.

 

OK so even if you have no debt you still have to pay for food and shelter. How do you propose to do that if you do not work?
Claiming welfare?
That's fine, but unfortunately it can't work if everyone does it.

Of course there is. People with mortgages and car loans change career all the time.
You can't seriously be saying you don't know that.

See above, you need some way to provide yourself with food and shelter, so you need to work anyway.
What's your alternative? Total self-sufficiency? I think you'll find thats a lot more work and affords a lot less freedom than convential employment. It's also unachievable. At some point you will need something you can't provide for yourself. It's just idiotic to think otherwise.

Who makes that judgement, you?
At 18 you can join the army, drive a car, go to prison for murder, drink alcohol, get married....
Are you seriously saying that's too young to make responsible financial decisions?

Unfortunately that myopia is your fault alone.
I think you're just trolling now.

 

I'm sorry @Mascara^Snake but your repeated denial of facts does not make them any less true.
Responding to the poster and not the post only serves to further prove the defeat of your argument.

 

Both are, however, textbook trolling techniques.

 

Ask the Greek Government. In hock to French and German bankers.

 

Actually they aren't. They're economically dependent on the EU.
It's a good example though. They borrowed way beyond their means to collateralise or repay.
Now they are dependent on handouts to operate.
They are lucky said handouts are available to them. Had they not requested the EU bail them out, they would not be, and the country would be far worse off.
Far from being enslaved, being bankrolled by the EU has prevented a massive humanitarian crisis.

 

some folks i knowed once owed some money and just run off and i think they have never pay it back. but if theym catched they cud go to prison then. So really you has to pay it back i think.

 

This thread seems to contain an unhealthy amount of aggression although looking through the posts I think @Mascara^Snake raises some very valid arguments.

The scale of financial pressures can be extremely diverse just the same as a Domme/sub dynamic. There is plenty of scope for overlap and it would be nieve and narrow minded to think otherwise.

I have certainly found myself jumping though more hoops due to the financial pressures I've faced in life. My freedom has also been restricted on numerous occasions due to my financial limitations.

A few years ago the UK was plagued by a number of high interest loan companies such as Wonga known for providing easy access loans and then charging extremely high interest on the repayments. They developed a reputation for scamming a large percentage of the population out of lots of money. They would certainly have a lot in common with with the darker more recognised perception of findom. Luckily new legislation put restrictions in place to help prevent these scams from creating too much dept.

 

Interesting notion about animals and debt.
I'm pretty sure if they had opposable thumbs and their brains were developed enough to understand and implement concepts like free trade and currency, they would be.

 

When you have to worry about health care and education costs on top of housing and other expenses -- few Americans have the freedom you are talking about. Many Americans, however, view freedom as no one "telling them what to do" and hence see free markets as a way to personal freedom v. a trap into a lifetime of wage-based, servitude.

 

Have you never heard of the Queen Bee then?

 

yeah...…….late stage capitalism can be a mindfuck (if you let it)

 

Sure it does. Free trade and currency are developmenta/evolutionary concepts. Like farming, fire and the invention of the wheel. Democracy and the abolition of slavery would be two more.

Interesting. So you're saying animals can apply logic?

 

@Mascara^Snake Or are you suggesting the way forward to free us all from enslavement to credit is a return to the animal kingdom?

 

Not only this, it is totally unsuitable for the modern world of limited resources being used up at an ever-increasing rate and huge population growth. It may have been the best of a set of possible systems for a while, but it needs to adapt rapidly to the modern world. Unfortunately it seems to be becoming more voracious.