Who's kidding whom?

I don't think a female ruled world will ever happen. The trouble with rulers is they tend to be fairly high on the sociopath scale. The very fact they want to rule should be the thing that prevents them from being able to. And self-aggrandisement is more of a male trait than female, so more (most) of our leaders are male. It ought to change but won't.

 

At the risk of taking this thread off in an unwelcome direction all I wanted to say is that while I utterly agree that Boris Johnson would be a complete disaster for the UK, only moderately worse than Gove, that doesn't mean May is the right woman for the job, The problem is in the current shambles that makes up politics in the UK I am not sure anyone is the right person for the job.

 

I can not help feel that as with men... one should always be extremely wary of those that seek power, however good their initial intentions appear to be to both you and themselves.

I've seen decent well meaning people go into local and national politics and with a year I have been unable to recognise them were it not for their faces.

 

Wow, lets break that down.

More educated women automatically are dominant? My wife is young yet a valedictorian with articles already published and she's very submissive. Sorry if that offends your fantasy.

And your notion that a small minority (please tell me - how many men are violent offenders?) - justifies young men being caged at puberty? That's borderline pedophilic. Whatever it is, it's not nice. Seriously, is this what CM is?!

 

The thing about fantasies is that that is all they are. Of course I don't think well-educated women automatically wish to dominate men. Of course I don't think boys should be forced into chastity devices, under any circumstances. Not in real life.

It's probably not a good idea to respond to idle erotic fantasies as if they reflect the fantasizer's views on reality, or to judge a fantasy on the grounds of how probable or ethical the scenario would be in real life. Fantasy lets us escape the constraints that real life in society rightly imposes. That doesn't mean that, by fantasizing, we disavow those constraints, which are right and proper.

In other words, don't take it literally!

 

That is not a fair reply. Mandynjack literally criticized me for a non-literal reply and insisted that all men on CM must bow to a supremacist viewpoint.

But if you guys are saying there's no room on CM for an alternative view. Fair enough. If that is the case, I mis-read I guess and I'll leave all the fantasists who believe that all men are slaves to it. And leave the site.

 

UK is in a complete mess at the moment. no true leadership skills coming through the ranks.

 

I'm sorry, but I didn't follow your exchanges with mandynjack, I was simply responding to what you said to me. When you say "if you guys on CM are saying there's no room for an alternative view on CM," I don't know what you mean. I'm not being disingenuous. Alternative view on what? Or do you mean any disagreement?

I've only been participating here for a week or two, despite a registration date of 2015. I've seen plenty of respectful disagreement and a bit of bad humor here and there. I'd say just go with the flow.

 

OK, reading your exchange with Mandynjack, I see you were referring to this: she "insisted that all men on CM must bow to a supremacist viewpoint." I do think you're being unnecessarily argumentative. Her exact words were "have a think about it." For me that doesn't constitute insisting that you must bow to anything. But it's not a big deal. Take a deep breath and enjoy your day!

 

I'm not sure whether it was Wiley Post or not, "Those that desire the presidency aren't qualified, and those that are qualified have no interest in the job."

 

Politics! I better keep quite, I'm too new to this site and always offend someone when talking politics. But! More women in higher office and business world I think would be a good thing. toddwr150r I tend to agree with you.

 

Might have been Will Rogers, or Samuel Clements though.

 

The only politics that are relevant to CM are those regarding who is in charge the orgasms in a relationship! Be it male, female or anyone or no one. Anyway I no longer get a vote on my orgasms so even that's not relevant.
Just a thought though, if there was a "Keep Men Chaste" party would it have to have a woman in charge and only female members? I bet there are plenty of suitably qualified male key holders out there!

 

It would be a great idea to have this come true. The world up to now is made and shaped based on the vision of men with minimal allowance for women to contribute, only after they had to needlessly fight for the right to do so. It would be amazing to have the world shaped through the vision of the female perspective. Not to mention that it makes no sense why anybody would have a sexual fantasy about women in control but not to actually want to see it play out in real life. It would be like living in Disney World everyday for them.

 

A reverse handmaids tale? Where men can't hold money or property? Where they have to be escorted anywhere in public? Kept as second class citizens and only for breeding purposes? YES PLEASE!!!