Why Do Folks think Chastity Makes You Calmer

I do not dislike WOMEN who are MASCULINIST ALLIES.

 

It is not MADE UP. It has a HISTORY, CULTURE AND TRADITION:

See HERE:

YES there is internal debate within the masculinist community. It is between the FEMINIST-IDENTIFYING men's lib group who FALSELY represent men's issues as SYMPTOMATIC OF PATRIARCHY and NON-FEMINIST MRAs who know that to represent equality you have to GO AGAINST THE PENDULUM SWING.

I am a MASCULINIST because I am the COUNTER-FORCE in MEDIA NARRATIVES and ACADEMIC REPRESENTATION that unilaterally represent the FEMININE IDENTITY. I do not represent STUPID TALKING POINTS like REVERSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, MADE TO PENETRATE and MALE CIRCUMCISION and things that happen MORE COMMONLY to WOMEN like MRAs do. I cannot STAND hearing about these things.

I talk about MALE DEATH TOLL by profession, violent assault and suicide and other issues DOMINANTLY experienced by MEN.

To add to this, there is also clear male advocacy within Red Pill and MGTOW spaces. While some of it ranges to the most extreme form of male supremacy, a lot of it is just about cultivating dominance in socially acceptable (or at least legal) manner, and developing a sense of stoic masculinity in solitude. Yes there is patriarchy but there is also traditional values and there is also PUA, which actually is forced to accept NON-TRADITIONAL and POLYAMOROUS conventions by design. There is tonne of debate not just between the manosphere and egalitarian OR feminist-identifying versions of men's advocacy.

But do you know, this is ridiculous to say that the validity of masculinism must rely on it being a divided and internally bickering, fractitious movement like feminism is ridiculous. We are a stoic and brotherly community who WILL NOT LET THE ENEMY DIVIDE US and I use a CONSISTENT AND UNIVERSAL DEFINITION that unites us under the banner of REPRESENTATION OF THE MASCULINE IDENTITY.

Also, HERE:

Masculinism is not that divided between the traditionalist and egalitarian ADVOCACY OF MEN as you think. Conservatives and traditionalist men like Jordan Peterson claim to ADVOCATE INCELS but really he wants to CONSCRIPT THEM TO FIGHT WARS while their WIVES AT HOME FUCK OTHER MEN then GIVE WHITE FEATHERS TO THE BRAVE AND INJURED returning from COMBAT. He is not a true MASCULINIST.

The MASCULINIST identifies that feminists and traditionalists want to USE MEN for their productive tendencies. The TRADITIONALIST MASCULINIST is an ALPHA MALE who ALREADY has a STRONG WOMAN that VALUES AND REWARDS his role as MASCULINIST PROTECTOR AND PROVIDER.

The EGALITARIAN MASCULINIST is a SIGMA MALE who recognises that MONOGAMY does not reduce COMPETITION for PARTNERS who become EXCLUSIVE but also treat their FEMINI-MEN like CASTRATED EUNUCHS and instead endeavour to COMPETE in the VICIOUS ONSLAUGHT that is CONTEMPORARY DATING.

The STOIC MASCULINIST gracefully BOWS OUT of dating and FOLLOWS HIS TRUE PURPOSE through the power of CULTIVATING HIS PASSION.

WE ARE NOT DIVIDED.

 

See
Attracting MASCULINIST ALLIES to Chastity?

 

FEMINISTS often ask for FEMINIST ALLIES. I am allowed to request MASCULINIST ALLIES.

 

Women Are Not Inherently More Effective at Communication Than Men

 

MEN have HISTORICALLY BEEN CONSCRIPTED in MY COUNTRY to FIGHT AND DIE in wars while women at home gave returning soldiers WHITE FEATHERS.

You DERAILED the conversation by discussing FGM. You think that CHILD SOLDIERS is some kind of LAUGHING MATTER?

 

From FET LIFE:

Actually, it was a FEMINI-MAN (psychologically SELF-CASTRATED, FEMINIST ALLY EUNUCH-type) who PROJECTED HIS IDEAS IN BIG, RED LETTERS AND CAPITAL FONT and EVERYONE LISTENED because he is A FEMINI-MAN. Because the FEMINI-MAN said EVERYBODY LEAVE THIS GUYS PROFILE, all of his followers listen because he is A FEMINI-MAN. But if a MASCULINIST uses BIG FONTS and CAPITAL LETTERS, he is WARPED AND DERRANGED. I call him BIG FONT BRAD. And a TRANS-WOMAN went on my profile and FALSELY ACCUSED me of RAPE APOLOGIA in BIG RED LETTERS to impose HER sense of PROJECTED IMPORTANCE.

FEMINIST HYPOCRISY. If YOUR friends can do it, SO CAN I.

 

Historically UNSUCCESSFUL approach:

MASCULINISM on "Culture War", Brigading and Obscuration
In this stand up show, Russell Howard ridiculed the notion that "cancel culture" exists because of some outlandish alt-right claims about "ultra woke" headlines designed to provoke gammon outrage:

- "Should we ban parents from cheering on their children?"
- "Is it right to remove church pews to help the obese?"
- "Is it really time to stop saying mums and dads?"
- "There is no place for headbands on babies?"
- "Sponge Bob is talking about global warming, and he's only doing it from one point of view!"
- "Is it selfish to use paddling pools?"
- "They're trying to bring race into Ernie and Bert!"
- "We're blighted by trans fish!"
- "The global tyranny of the metric system!"
- "Who knew that algebra was racist?"
- "Can the black panther be played by a white guy?"
- "How do I get pregnant?"

As hilariously cringe as this all sounds, the truth is that a far more insidious narrative from the left does exist but alt-right attempts at highlighting or changing that dialogue are blunt at best, misleading at worst. And Russell Howard does a poor job of getting to crux of the matter as later in the show he says (to paraphrase) "most of us with common sense in the middle of the spectrum don't get off on making outrageous claims - the culture war doesn't exist!".

I'm not going to deep dive into race or gender dysphoria because it doesn't have much relevance but I will drop in to the discussion what a linguist has to say about "how easy it is ... not" to correctly identify gendered pronouns across culture and language in different social circles. The fact is, from the masculinist perspective, "cancel culture" (cultural suppression?) does exist: moral outrage from slightly misspoken words or phrases, expressed in such a way to force advocates of a different ideology to constantly revise their terminology and invest energies into articulate word crafts in such a way that stifles free expression of their language lest they be ridiculed, castigated, undermined, subverted, misrepresented and ostracised through social media.

Let's use examples from my own writing:

We are dealing with a crisis in men's issues ranging from the increased prevalence of violent assault rates
"That's just men beating each other up"

higher incarceration
"Men going to prison for violence ... duh!"

higher professional death toll
"Well if builders didn't wolf whistle at women maybe they'd go work on construction sites and die there too!"

mental health issues and increased suicide rate
"Men can't talk for shit"

not to mention more sexual and romantic isolation among young men than ever before
"Incel! Misogyny! Entitlement!"

This is just from the first sentence of my first entry. As you can see, it's impossible to engage these people which means that the young masculinist cannot get his point heard but for his own smaller circles of the like minded. There is a real problem in today's society where the commercialised media promotes women's issues to the point that men's issues are drowned out, suffocated, marginalised and explained away as allegedly being symptomatic of "patriarchy".

So we have moral outrage, misrepresentation, fallacious reasoning and poor interpretation as the first instances of cultural smothering - and I am not even talking about mainstream media platforms, television debates, interviews or political platforms. This is just everyday conversation - things the masculinist has to engage within his own friendship circles, his family and social media. What else is done to suppress the young masculinist online?

Brigading. On my first fetlife account, I made a straight forward post detailing why I felt it was more difficult for men to date than women in the current dating climate and I received hundreds of antagonistic comments berating, castigating and ridiculing me and assumptions about my personality, my message, and the nature of male sexual and romantic isolation. This isn't enough though. What do feminists do when they see that the young masculinist will not delete, block or cower from hostility but continue to debate from a well-reasoned and informed position?

Silence. The feminist troll cannot engage in open and honest or well-reasoned, empathetic communication so it tries to smother its opponents words into obscurity on the online platform while pushing forwards hundreds of thousands of "girl power" posts and immature women complaining that they've been objectified by the existence of beautiful models, that boys don't know how to cry, that they shouldn't have to wear make up and how unfair it is they have a socially-accepted-for-women concealer for their acne scars. Issues like men literally dying are smothered into obscuration.

But the brave young masculinist soul recognises that obscuration is no different from brigading. It is just another machiavellian tactic employed to hurt the masculinist's self-esteem and employ cultural smothering. The creatively soulful and passionate masculinist intellectual doesn't back down - he keeps fighting the good fight and makes sure other young men hear his message and receive inspiration. Never be bullied or ignored into silent obscuration - make sure people know what you have to say. Views, comments and likes will come and go. Exchange of ideas with other souls will develop over time, they will not always be in agreement but that is ok - as I've said, constructive debate can only serve to strengthen the ideas of the bright and bold, young masculinist.

 

Incarcerated FEMALE INMATES are JUST AS VIOLENT towards each other as IMPOVERISHED WORKING CLASS MEN in GHETTOISED COMMUNITIES. The difference is TESTOSTERONE enables men to REACH THE TOP.

MORE female leadership will not CHANGE systemic issues like ECONOMIC CLASS DIVISION.

 

MASCULINISM on FEMINIST BULLSHIT and "You Can't Identify as This/You Can't Identify as That"
I have written extensively before on cultural hypsersensitivity and how it suppresses legitimate, rational counter-narratives in the norms. Today I'm going to express my own anger on how feminists use cultural hypersensitivity to target the very way people identify themselves. A few years back, I innocently referred to myself as "incel" to me it just meant a dude that can't get laid. But when I asked feminists on reddit what it was they have against these guys they all jumped down my throat:

• "you can't call yourself that, it's like calling yourself a nazi"
• ""People's Democratic Party of North Korea" isn't a democratic party don't you know?"
• "Incels represent misogyny, hate and violence"
• "Incel-ism is an ideology not a condition"
• "You can get laid just go get a hooker"

And all the rest of it. The fact is, if I want to call myself an incel, I damn well ought to be able to call myself what I want. A fucking incel - fuck you. Some feminist on this site has written - amidst other articles - one where she refers to those who represent moderate incel talking points but refuse to identify as incel so as not to incur the wrath of irrationally angry and unreasonable feminist detractors as "PISs", I kid you not.

So damn it, even when you try to do what they want, you use verbose mouthfuls like "sexually and romantically isolated" these fuckers don't care - they'll throw something else at you to take you down. "Oh but that's not feminism". It might not be what you think of as feminism but it is what feminism represents itself in practice, in the media, through our cultural institutions and in every day life.

And what about masculinism? Masculinism is an ideology of male supremacy. Even though oxford reference defines it as a broad spectrum of different ideologies, no that doesn't matter - dictionary is right, dictionary is always right. This is why we need a rational counter-narrative in the media folks. Because otherwise everyone just sees feminists as the golden angels from the Garden of Eve that can do no wrong and represent only the purest aspects of femininity men have written poems about for the centuries since they began referring to the sea as a "She".

But masculinists? Those are the fallen angels, the devils down below. Yesterday I began to contemplate referring to myself as "neomasculinist" to distinguish myself from a history of traditionalist ideologies contradictory to men's interests, responsible for sending them to war and to work on dangerous oil rigs - all issues that feminists seek to undermine as being explainable by "patriarchal causes" or some other dogmatically pretentious verbose jargon. I just googled the term though and you know what it says neomasculinism is - an extremist ideology of male supremacy, something that advocates rape through pick-up artistry.

And I am done with this insanity. Guys refer to yourself as what you want. Be a fucking incel, man. Be a masculinist. Own it with some balls - fuck these man-hating feminist bitches. They don't define you. You ain't gonna get laid by them just because you say you care about how toxic masculinity causes women's issues in society and you totally ain't one of those guys. I mean, what are you saying you spineless, castrated fucking eunuchs. Whose team are you going to swing for? Yours or theirs?

Who's team do you think feminist women are swinging for? That's right: they're looking out for women's interest. They're recruiting "good men" and "feminist allies" to be moral proselytisers for their cause and vigilantes that go around challenging "toxic men" and getting their asses handed to them. Masculinism is the only rational counter-narrative. Masculinism is the only weapon we have to defeat the cultural insanity. Don't be naive and try to bargain with them as an egalitarian - they'll just call you a sexist and claim to be the marginalised sex anyway.

The only way to get equality at this stage is to reverse the swing of the pendulum, and at this moment - in all of our media, everyone is shouting loud about how women are some kind of persecuted victims. They are not. Male death toll is higher than everywhere before: men are literally dying. Shout it out loud and proud and own it with some fucking balls and dignity. Be a masculinist.

 

no u.

 

POINT IS ... if you take women away from the men, they will still FIGHT for TOP DOG. Good ole MAGGIE THATCHER blew up a boat of Argentinian soldiers on their way back HOME. HILARY CLINTON always has had VESTED OIL INTERESTS in middle-east and would have INCREASED WAR OUTPUT worse than ANY OTHER DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN LEADER.

Having more FEMALE LEADERS does not address:
- CLASS
- RACE
- ETHNICITY
- RELIGION
- ORIENTATION
- GENDER DYSPHORIA
- ETC.

Feminist CONDESCENSION.