The gallery

I am very sympathetic!

 

Its not? What is it then if not? I can only think of medieval chastity to protect virginal girls as non related to kink or sexuality.

 

What's the definition of a kink? I'm serious. Is a FLR a kink? Is a decision to abstain from coming a kink?

 

In a way it is pretend. You dont literally hold the legal right over someone as a slave. Safe words are a thing and the lack of them would be an enormous abuse of a vulnerable person (in my opinion). Its not just abstaining, it is gifting power over yourself to someone else, a power dynamic in a sexually charged act. So I guess it depends on what you mean by 'its a game'? Many relationships in our lives can be boiled down to kind of description no?

 

Or perhaps people who undergo chastity arent robots? I think you would be very hard pressed to find a chastity sub that wasnt exceptionally turned on by it, because its inherent to chastity. I can comprehend things that dont turn people on, riding a bus, doing taxes, relaxing on the couch. But 'giving up sexuality to someone superior to me' is pretty explicitly not that. I think it would be pretending to not acknowledge that aspect no?

 

Then I would charge you to find me a slave whom is in chastity, whom is not in any way turned on by chastity. I think you'll look for a long time indeed.

 

What I find really odd, we have a gallery where males can display their caged status and females can display their control over males, FLR etc, but males who come here pretending to be female I just don't get at all. Unless of course it's just another kink.

 

You'll pardon me for misreading, but did you imply someone who disagrees with someone else is a male? Is this some kind of joke? Because if you implied something like that, I might be inclined to find you rather asinine.

 

Then I would ask whom? What would be the motivation to someone to lock their genitals up one day and then seek out a dominant to hold the keys? What non sexual motivation might that have?

 

They may not be turned on by chastity itself, but rather what chastity does for their life in its domino effects.

 

Well, I may pardon someone who is contrite, but never someone who assumed something so far off piste, it could only come from an entrenched belief that an opinion is a personal attack.

 

Well if I assumed wrong then forgive me, but that did seem to be the implication.

 

Isnt that still being turned on by chastity, just with extra steps? The act itself doesnt need to be the arousal, but its effects still can be. You would still be doing it for some sort of thrill, some sort of loss of power viewed in a sexual aspect.

 

I forgive you

 

Because what you're saying makes little sense, though I suppose some people might do it for penance. This doesnt strike me as a particularly religious forum though.

 

Well I guess you can only see it from a female viewpoint. From a male perspective, being locked in chastity and giving someone authority over it, can very much be a self declared penance. No sexual thrill involved. But I suppose a lot of women who just assume it's a sex thing.

 

It makes sense in that they would be fantasized about as a fetish. The sexual arousal is what makes them do these things or say they want these things. Thats about the only justification I can find, men are extremely strange.

 

I've never met a man that would do so, but perhaps they are out there? Why do you do it then darling, if you dont mind me asking?

 

How would you know that, you are female. You can only assume a male thinks that way. Of course, porn may colour one's opinion.