My modified P-5000 until a teasing session resulted in the final image when it failed miserably haha luckily it was only purchased as a sizing confirmation before the order of a Steelworxx Tube Jacket and a Looker 03 but with the tube jacket PA securing system ;-)
I also used the PA5000 to get to the correct size before ordering the Tube Jacket. Kept the tube jacket locked on for about 9 months, but I found that it pinched at the locking mechanism on my ball sack sometimes. In the end we went for the Lori's #5 and all solved. I have however been thinking about modifying the Tube Jacket by cutting off the entire locking mechanism and using a lockable Pa ring though the hole. That would solve the problem completely. I would then have a backup if the Lori's ever needed to be removed.
@young88 that sounds like a REALLY good idea!!!! My only thought would be that could there be a possibility of pinching as the PA ring moves from side-to-side...? Bear in mind I have never used a ringless device!!! I find I get terrible pinching with my current cage when my PA ring is free to sway from side-to-side BUT it is a different design entirely.... I guess if the PA ring was a relatively tight fit through the device, thus not allowing any movement, any possibility of pinching would be alleviated...? What do you think...? With the absolute kindest regards. J.
I actually approached malechastitynow.com about doing this with their mouse trap. Taking the fixed pa off and using one of his pa locks instead but he mentioned it would not work due to constant pinching. Thinking about it, I think he is right. I have made some modifications to my pa 5k and so far so good. The tube was too big which allowed everything to pull on my pa so I insterted some 1/8" rubber into the tube making it tighter and smaller gripping my shaft and taking the load off of the pa. Seems to be ok so far but only been 2 days. My pa5k actually split like yours did and super glued it back together, seems alot stronger and luckily has not split again.