The Future of Chastity - Real Talk...

A contract to set boundaries and expectations is reasonable I believe. Puts everything on the table. Anytime in history the govt has meddled with anything they've fucked it up tho. Being gay was not far from a crime for example. What are considered homosexual acts are still largely illegal in many places. The govt or courts has no place in the bedroom as far as consenting adults goes.

 

Hard boundaries and all other aspects should be specified in the contract. Nobody is forcing you to sign a contract you don't fully agree with.
And, btw, it's the very opposite of government overreach - it's the freedom to enter contracts as you see fit.

 

What do you mean by "incompatible factions"?

 

So a hard boundary is broken are there going to be endless legal fees and arguments to see who broke the contract? We're perfectly free without a legal binding contract involved. Any party involved should be able to opt out without fear of repercussions monetary or otherwise.

 

What you are forgetting is that even if pierced you can orgasm in a cage. Just look at porn. Hold a vibrator against you cage, pierced or not and you will orgasm. Insert a stick inside the cage through the top or opening and you can jerk off and come that way too. Anal sex can make you orgasm so you are making a false assumption about piercing. I also see most cagers being sold to hetero couples and you seem to be making assumptions that the gays will use them more without any substantial proof other than your opinion. I can opine that the opposite is true according to what sellers state and what you read online and see in porn. My wife is bi and would never want her female sex partners to be locked in chastity but with me, she wants me locked up because she is not that into sex with males. This way she makes sex all about her orgasms. I have not had intercourse in about 35 years as I was in chastity prior to being locked up on the honor system. Oral has been about 5 times in the last 20 years.

You may ultimately be correct, but not as it stands today. Depends on what the next latest kink is. Now everyone was to be cuckolded. It is not fun. My wife and I tried it and both hated it. It is what got my wife into sex with girls as the other guy was very rough with her and it did not go according to what we saw in porn that is scripted. I was a cuckold to a previous girlfriend and she ended up gang banging all my friends in my house. Then I kicked her out as I has only one rule, no sex with anyone I know or knows me and she broke that rule so I kicked her out and not one single guy she had sex with wanted her to move in with them so she had to move back to her family farm. She learned that guys find any girl who is a sure thing attractive but when it comes to living with them, not so much.

 

But what's the point of ANY type of contract then? Let's say a student put 200+K into some art degree only to find out years later they are unable to find decent employment with it. Should they also be able to opt out? Or let's say your employer gives you a nice sign-up bonus, and a few weeks later you find office grind isn't to your liking. Should you be able to walk away without paying a thing?

 

Comparing borrowing hundreds of thousands of dollars to how big of a strapon you'll take really defines apples and oranges. The argument in court be great however. Lawyers measuring dildos as plaintiffs exhibit A.

 

tl;dr: the future of chastity involves dreary legal involvement that nobody wants anything to do with and an espresso machine on my junk that I'm not sharing with anyone.

 

I want some that expresso. Sharing is caring

 

same here! Chastity was all my Madams idea in the first place, she loves keeping my cock locked every day.

 

I absolutely agree with this. The more younger women become aware of the role that chastity can play in controlling their BF's attitude, the more common it will become. I, too, imagine that a mainstreaming of it would lead to a seismic shift in relationship dynamics in the western world.

 

The inability to feely enter binding contracts, i.e. state meddling in private matters is the very essence of an authoritarian sociery.
On the other hand, the ability to enforce any contract is one of the corner stone of libertarian philosophy.

 

Nothing's wrong with a weird social structure. And in any case: "weird" - by what standard?

 

Lawyer here: In first year of law school you learn that certain types of contracts are illegal and unenforceable. For example, any contract to commit a crime.

 

It is becoming more public domain...
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/confessions/a44878206/chastity-cage-sex/
https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a36789418/male-chastity-cages/
They're not publications that appear on everyone's coffee table, but they're not back street top shelf material either.

 

One indicator of male chastity becoming more mainstream.

Short form video social media - tiktok, reels etc.

Obviously their algorithms have detected some of my kinks. That given, I'm seeing a significant increase in videos referring to male chastity being created by women that appear to be barely twenty years old.

I think most are trying to use the platforms to drive content to their OnlyFans. That said, it's interesting that they're focusing on our kink rather than generic porn that must have a bigger potential audience. It also shows that awareness of male chastity must be increasing within their generation.

I also see porn sites including amateur porn with femboys of the same generation. They're not transgender (porn of that obviously exists), but are being feminised by dominant women. Porn like that wasn't easy to come by 15-20 years ago.

My conclusion is that the current generation of twenty somethings are more aware of our kink than any before.

 

I’m surprised no one on this thread has taken the discussion in the direction of novel technology. To me the most exciting future direction of chastity/flr might be realised by means of nanotechnology and pharmacology. Imagine for example an implant that would enhance arousal while preventing orgasm… or one that would make erection painful so you’d have to avoid stimulation.
Better still a woman having a phone app that could control male arousal levels remotely, inhibit orgasm and administer pain remotely.
Seems likely to me that technology to enhance sexual performance and enjoyment will definitely be created, and the potential for using it in the way I suggest will quite possibly follow.

 

I've a simpler idea for how technology could influence chastity. 3D scanning + 3D printing could mean a first-time fit for nearly every chastity wearer, leading to more men locked.

 

Precisely

 

It’s unlikely there’s be a commercially viable market for hi-tech chastity methods, but there’d definitely be a huge market for tech to augment arousal and delay orgasm. So presumably these could be used to make a person intensely aroused yet unable to gain relief.