Ergonomic vs round and ring cage compatibility.

Discussion in 'Chinese devices' started by notdisclosed, Nov 9, 2020.

  1. notdisclosed
    Offline

    notdisclosed Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2010
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Local Time:
    1:41 AM
    I am looking for some measurements

    I have the A275 device similar to https://www.houseofdenial.com/colle...es/products/steel-hod-s77?variant=72864169985

    I am looking at the following device https://www.houseofdenial.com/colle...jts-s213-chastity-cage?variant=32003006300221 to see if it is more comfortable.

    Does anyone know the gap between ring and cage for this model with both 45mm and 50mm ring?
    Also does anyone know if the cage from the a275 with ergonomic ring is compitable with this round ring?
     
  2. zbovka
    Offline

    zbovka Design Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2018
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Local Time:
    7:41 AM
    Go for the circular one. The ergonomic one only makes sense if it is tight fitting and the cage is erected pointing up which is not the case at all and can painfully press on your vas deferns. It also greats a slightly larger escape gap opportunity at the bottom.
     
  3. notdisclosed
    Offline

    notdisclosed Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2010
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Local Time:
    1:41 AM
    These two models are not compatible.

    The steel JTS ones are mostly interchangeable also between ergonomic and round rings. They steel JTS ones are not compatible with the S77/a275. They have different posts.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice