MCN Contender with Glans ring. Pull-out Proof without Piercing!

I’m very interested in the original poster’s progress with this device and would like to know more if they have any more information about it to share since their last post?

 

LOL, whatever.

 

Thank you for the update on time frame and wearability. It’s much appreciated.

 

Would you consider making a separate piece holding the glans ring, so that it is put on before the cage goes over it? That would make it easy to get into the glans ring, but hard to get to it after the cage is attached. Something like this:
https://www.chastitymansion.com/forums/index.php?gallery/photos/60942/

 

Are the photos that you have posted with the smaller ring or the larger one?

i would like to buy one of the Glans Armor No Piercing devices and I am trying to find reference for how tight the ring should be. There isn’t much out there and your thread has been very helpful!

 

Hmm, not sure if I'm missing something. The glans ring is separate from the cage, and does go on before the cage is put over it...

 

As you can see, I've switched the ring from stainless steel to rubber.

The outer diameter of a stainless steel glans ring limits what size of glans ring can pass through-and-into a cage ring.

A rubber ring allows more variation for the glans ring...because it is flexible, a glans ring made of rubber may be compressed and inserted through the cage ring.

I've worn the Glans Armor in the above post comfortably, for three days and didn't experience any issues. I did pull out of it, to test, but could not get back into the device.

I'm really pleased with the rubber and feel it is a really good choice. The nitrile has excellent resistance to petroleum based oils and gasoline, and is resistant to hydrocarbons, acids and bases. Soap and water aren't going to affect it, and I honestly don't see the rubber ring breaking down.

Also, in the event someone ordered an incorrectly sized rubber ring, they could send just the ring/connector back to me and have the rubber ring replaced with one of a different size.

The cost would be minimal compared to making and replacing a stainless steel ring, since it would take much less time to make and replace a rubber ring.

 

Was it very difficult to pull out? How tight of a fit do you recommend for the glans ring?

 

It took a bit of work to pull out of the ring. The ring I am using has a 1-1/8" inside diameter. It's difficult to get a precise measurement of my flaccid width since soft skin is so squishy, but I believe my shaft is around 1.4" in the spot directly behind the glans.

As far as how tight a fit someone should get, I feel it's a personal choice and is why I strongly believe in using test rings because they will provide good visual (and more importantly, sensory) feedback. You're not "guessing" in regard to sizing, and you get to choose how much compression you would like (or can stand <--- a reminder to not become aroused).

The rubber rings I am making are made of the same material as the test rings that are sold by the company I mention on the homepage of my website, which I feel is a win-win because those rings will provide you with excellent sensory feedback.

 

That is a lot more compressed than I thought it should be. I ordered the sizing rings today but the smallest I got was 1 1/16”. It seems like my best flacid measurements are aprox 89mm around which comes to 1.115” in diameter vs the 1.0625” of that ring. So It sounds like I might have to make a second order.

Curious question to the OP. What were your measurements vs the ring that fits you best if you don’t mind me asking.

 

Excellent posts above by the MFG and an interesting swap to the rubber. I've got my test rings and will probably order a glans armor later this summer. My biggest concern is removal when excited. The penis can expand so quickly I'd be afraid I couldn't get the ring off fast enough. But the rubber may definitely help with that.

 

I plan on getting one really soon, especially with this latest update

@MaleChastityNow is the rubber glans ring available for any cage, or just select models?

 

The rubber ring is a LOT more forgiving than a steel ring. The choice of rubber I made has a trade off between having some flexibility and 'give", and no flexibility at all. I do feel it will allow for some accompanied expansion when a guy becomes aroused, but not so much that zero compression takes place.

 

The pre-made cages don't have enough room in the very front of the cage to accomodate an acceptable "setback" for mounting the lock cylinders that hold the glans ring in place, so the setup is better suited for a Glans Armor 2 or a Contender.

 

Well, it could be just me and the amount of compression my own body can comfortably handle. One of the most difficult things for me manufacturing these devices is that every persons body is different, and reacts differently to a specific set of parameters.

As such, sometimes it's necessary to make slight alterations and fine tune things in order for a device to mate well with an individuals body and how it responds.

In such cases I've found it's good to make slight alterations one-at-a-time, in order to perform a process of elimination to remove the parameter(s) that prevent a device from becoming one's "forever device."

 

Thanks, that was not clear before you posted these pictures.

 

sounds like the item im looking for everytime i think i have one after three days begins to slip downwards dont want a piercing so this looks promising wow nice

 

Yeah, swing and a miss on my sizing rings. When in doubt, order smaller…much smaller. At least my wife got a laugh out of it.

 

Looking forward to hearing feedback from using the new ring. I really want to order something custom with anti pullout and the contender looks amazing.

 

I received mine today, put it straight on. It’s been on all day, haven’t noticed it’s there at all, so different to ball trap devices that I’ve been wearing for years.

I tried to pull it off, gave it a really good tug, it ain’t shifting. If I did manage to get it off, I don’t think I’d be able to refit it without having the key, so my key holder would know!

The small amount of weight pulls the penis down very slightly, so I haven’t had any pressure from turtling during the day. Looking forward to seeing how it feels when I’m aroused and how effective it is in not giving access to the sweet spot, which I’m sure it will do the intended job.

Thanks Mark @MaleChastityNow , as always, great quality products delivered very quickly. Received in Australia in less than 3 weeks after placing the order, that’s speedy!

 

That last post is exactly what I needed to read. Thank you. Please continue to post your experience. I am 90% ready to pull the trigger on my own.

 

For everyone reading this, Lakeman purchased a Glans Armor with the glans ring attachment, and not a Contender with a glans ring attachment.

 

Ok, it got a go this morning “under pressure”. I was very aroused and my wife fondled me for some time, but I couldn’t cum. Perhaps I could if super aroused but the device allowed her to play with no risk of an accident today.

The slight pressure from the bars was pleasant, a very different feeling from a ball trap device, nice to be able to be fully erect but still constrained from orgasm.

Afterwards I found by poking a finger between the bars I was able to slip the rubber ring off and take it off, and then similarly get it back on, although that was trickerier.

If there were say 10 bars rather than 8, the smaller gaps wouldn’t allow fingers to get in, meaning for me it would very difficult to take off without the key, and I’d say pretty much impossible to put back on without using the key. Mark, @MaleChastityNow would you consider a modification to install more bars?

In that scenario, this would close to the perfect device for me, never having to worry about scrotum burn from ball trap devices again would be great.