A better lock?

I looked and looked for a more secure padlock than the "luggage size" Master padlock, and couldn't find anything that would be suitable. Because it really has to be fairly small, I don't think a more "pick-proof" lock is available. It wouldn't make much sense, from a manufacturing viewpoint, to make a padlock with a high-security tumbler mechanism, but with a shackle so thin you can cut it with a Dremel tool in about 5 seconds.

Another possibility is "security screws": screws that need a custom tool to insert or remove. However, with the Internet, you should be able to locate a workable tool without too much time or trouble.

That leads me back to tamper-evident labels or tags. It would be easy enough for your KH to put a label on, and take a picture with her cell phone. My KH always has her phone nearby, so it would be easy to verify the number. The spare stickers and tags don't need to be secured; the only one that counts is the one that's guarding the keyhole.

 

As Mark121 says, tamper-evident seals with photos are the answer. You can even take the photo yourself and upload it here! Absolutely zero hassle for your Goddess and EXIF data includes the Unix time-stamp which means you can't substitute it later for one with a different numbered seal!

Here's mine as an example:-

​

Unix Timestamp 1295614368​

 

Every now & then i do a google search for locks, stainless hardware, etc. & usually find a few oddities that look like they may be useful in making my chastity device more secure. Just a couple of days ago i found a lock that is stainless steel & has a concealed hasp, or in this case, a pin. It's a trailer coupler lock that has a 1/4" diameter pin that is 1" long.

Here is a link to it. http://www.trailerhitches.com/hitch-accessories/locks/hiddenhitchcouplerlock1inchspan.cfm?TID=CE1165&source=gaffiliates&subid=k232999&affnam=Formula%20Shopping&kwid=Primary

My plan is to remove the locking pin on the chastity device & use the coupler lock in it's place providing it clears the device itself so it can be closed. It isn't drastically expensive & might be worth a try. If it doesn't work for me on "The Fort" device I have, I will use it on my trailer.

 

Interesting to see if it works....

LOL

 

Stainless steel panties! :blink:

 

you would think the cb manufacturers would make such a lock ,
a small secure barrel lock or search for one and supply it . you only have to look at the number of visits to this post 187
i think i will do some research i am sure if i find something suitable buy in bulk
there would be no shortage of customers
however if someone beats me to it let me know and i will be your first customer

 

When you say "still uses the same pin", I assume you're only considering those who are in cage/tube style devices, all of which can be easily defeated whilst still wearing them. I'm sorry to pour cold water on a good idea but I don't see the point of increasing security on a device where security isn't the main problem and I'd hate to see you invest money in something which may have less of a market, for that very reason, than you anticipate.

 

OK - taking that a section at a time:-

Yes, I wear a full belt - as my avatar clearly shows and as my other posts make clear. I do have a Curve and a CB-3000 too so I know about the issues with them. My My-Steel belt uses a very small brass padlock which sits in a groove around a locking post and cannot be rotated so that the key-hole is visible which prevents me from picking it. No doubt, with practice, it would be possible.

No, I'm not referring to pull-out although that is a minor problem - I'm referring to the ease with which "illicit pleasure" can be achieved by using cotton buds or similar items through the various slots, holes etc. which all tube devices have and/or by the use of a vibrator or even simply by shaking them when one is in the right mood. Because these devices have a fairly low mass, applying a vibrator to them makes them vibrate enough to produce the desired result.

Why destroy the device? simply cut the hasp of the lock or the pin itself - much cheaper to replace. Similarly, the hasp of the lock can be cut on full belts which use a padlock - the security is no greater in that repect.

On the basis that all locks can be defeated either by picking, cutting, drilling or grinding or by cutting whatever the lock is attached to, the only true security lies in the consequences of doing so and those consequences can be identical whether it is as a result of destroying something or simply removing a sticker. The advantages of the sticker then lie in the reduced expense involved in replacement as there are no damaged parts to restore and in the safety aspect of the ease of use of an emergency key which the wearer can carry at all times.

Putting our sensible heads on for a moment: let's face it, only a fool would want to be locked in a device which couldn't be easily removed in an emergency.

The big "advantage" of life in a full belt lies in the way in which both its mass and the damping effect of its intimate contact with the pelvis suppress the effects of a vibrator. You can feel the vibrations are there but the amount of vibration which is transferred to ones "naughty bits" is only sufficient to increase ones frustration. It's the same with shaking it and as for access through holes or slots - there isn't any. Pull-out? No way - not if properly designed and fitted.

To put it bluntly, nearly everyone can come while wearing a tube device - hardly anyone can come while wearing a correctly sized full belt with a properly designed tube.

Hygeine at the rear isn't a problem for me as my belt has twin rear chains. At the front, my tube has a grille at the top through which a dilute solution of liquid soap can be introduced and water can be poured. Routine removal is advisable, as with all devices, simply for skin condition checks but I've worn mine for 9 days at a stretch without problems and I'm "intact" so once a week is adequate for anybody although I would advise twice as often whilst getting acclimatised.

As for comfort: like all devices, it takes some acclimatisation but the main advantage is the lack of rings behind the balls so morning wood is teasingly frustrating, not painful.

So, my conclusions are that I (and most people) can "have fun" without having to remove a tube device, which makes them useless for their intended purpose and that only a tamper-evident seal will prevent both lock picking and use of the emergency key without detection whilst still allowing easy removal of the device in emergencies.

 

Yes: Tollyboy for one. However, it is still my considered opinion that there is no lock more secure against undetectable illicit opening than one with a tamper-evident seal across the key-hole.

 

Subby, how did that lock end up working for you?

 

Okay this is something I'm interested in. I have been looking for a better lock also. I don't know how to pick it but I know it can't be too hard. I upgraded to the brass master lock with a rubber wrap and a bigger key "High security" is what the package says, but it looks like the same lock with a wrap around it and plastic on the key. I bought it any way because we wanted more keys. i wanted an emergency one in my wallet for issues, like random drug screens or other thinks like that where I don't want to be wearing it when I go somewhere unscheduled. And have a few spares for my wife. the nice think about padlocks is you can cut them with bolt cutters if the keys are lost, and you don't know how to pick them. I'll post a few links of some the lock pages I've been looking at...

http://www.lustlock.com/eng/lustlock.html

http://www.keykop.com/ this one is a little big but it will fit the standard pin of a 5/32 shackle. the loop is 2 1/2" thought it would be intresting to put through the pin and have the lock under the ring, not sure how comfortable it would be, but they have a very high security version...

 

I bought a lock kind of like this before, only to find out that while the cord would fit, the actual fitting back into the lock piece was way too big. I didn't see schematics that had that size listed. Did I miss them???

 

I'm not sure, but there are a few other sites that carry the lock and I think one of them show the lock with the shackle removed so you can see the ends. I the one that uses the fixed rings, not the cable, I think is the same diameter. I'm not even sure what the diameter is of the cable lock. Sorry not much help. I don't have any plans of buying one yet, but if I do I'll post a review.

 

Looks a neat lock from picture but the clevis pin looks very easy to break where you have drilled it out oversized to suit. I know from past experience drilling things oversize they tend to snap off especially when they have got hot from the drilling it weakens them. Looks a neat idea though

 

Looks very interesting? What is that type of lock called?