A Female Led political party

How will you convince them to disband their team on their own?

 

I asked this because ironically this power to women political system can only be possible if men give away their power just like FLR is only possible because men are deliberately giving up power to their female partner.

 

Is not having the ability to have men give up their power the ultimate power?

 

Hmm, interesting viewpoint! So rolling with your theory, what do you suppose triggers a male to give up this power? Let's assume it isn't out of mild curiosity.

 

You're assuming all women would vote for your party.

I have no idea. I actually joined this board to understand FLR. I didn't even know it existed 2 months ago.

 

Fair enough, so assuming you joined because it interested you, would it be safe to assume you have interests in deference?

 

I have interest in Femdom, I didn't know there were married couples who were in this lifestyle permanently. To me it's only a short term sexual thing.

 

Femdom as a short term thing. That's a first.

 

Oh, I don't doubt you are hardworking. But since when does low unemployment rate equals to those unemployed chose to do so, as if there are some magical cutoff to unemployment rate. This argument makes no sense, and even if true, it would mean 3 years ago there were people who can't find jobs not by choice? Job posting does not mean anyone can get it. It's extremely difficult for homeless people to get a job, same for people with mental health problems or physical disabilities, don't be so entitled.

Maybe it's time you realize you are in a lucky position and there are people less fortunate. Maybe you can try take some time off work and do some volunteer work. Meet some of those people and be more open-minded. I did that during college and meet people I otherwise would not have. Surely you've earned enough in this good economy to take some time off work and be a better person?

To not get derailed from this post, I think women are generally more empathetic than men. A female led party will likely do better in terms of putting themselves in other people's position .

 

@Blue Moon, I rest my case. Don't feel bad, I know you don't have the capacity to see it. Just keep gorging yourself. It's easier than thinking.

 

Allow me to remind you what the 9th Amendment says: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

In other words, there are plenty of other rights we have that are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

 

Such a compassionate individual. Your kind are what is wrong with America.

 

No, you are a just a selfish asshole.

 

@Blue Moon, don't stress, I have no desire to ever eat off your plate. Or even look at it. I can tell you are a comfort food kind of guy, don't let me slow you down, keep sucking down those pineapple pizzas and yoo-hoos and scanning Fox News for more right wing pearls of wisdom.

Goddess Lucy, we need Female Government as soon as possible.

Free health and education for everybody (even the dingbats!)

 

As expected the debate turned more about left versus right than male versus female because there are important male and female figures in both sides of the political spectrum.

 

Blue Moon may have been a bit extreme. But they’re not THE problem. The other extreme is also part of the problem. Those that think that they don’t work and should be given everything.

AOC’s Green Raw Deal included language that said that the government would support those who DiD NOT WANT To WORK.

I’m sorry but if you’re too lazy to work why should the tax payers support you?

Welfare reform is long overdue.

Now don’t get me wrong, I believe we need to care for those that CANNOT take care of themselves. I even believe that we should provide ASSISTANCE to those who need it for reasonable periods. So that they can get back on their feet and return to being productive members of society.

And let’s not forget that many donate to food pantries, homeless shelters, etc. Much support to those who don’t qualify for government assistance comes from private charities, church’s and giving individuals.

Am I what is wrong with America? I suffered during the Great Recession. I was denied government assistance, and I had to get help from family, friends, and others who helped me.

I’ve recovered and I give what I can, I volunteered building Habitat houses before I was injured and I’ll do so after I’m fully recovered. In the meantime, I give what I can to help others when I can, but I don’t think it’s the governments job to support people who don’t want to work.

So is it wrong to want strong Mom like figures to be our leaders? I’m against the ones who want to give everything to everyone. Maybe what we need is more Moms who give discipline, who don’t let kids run wild and who enforce the rules. In this case I’m using Mom and kids as a metaphor for elected officials and kids as the public, but we also see what lax parenting has done so maybe it’s not as much a metaphor as I intended.

Again, yes we need more women in office. But we need string women. Wise women. Women who can be caring but also loving and tough. Discipline isn’t abuse and being fair and just isn’t either.

 

Free nothing for nobody. Taking my hard-earned dollars and giving them to others is not benevolence. It is theft.

 

Welfare only amounts to 9% of government's budget. Did you know that 7% goes to the banks as interest just because they lend money they don't even have to begin with. I wonder if you're okay with that.

 

Not really, most seem to just enjoy part time BDSM or FLR at a club or in the bedroom, 24/7 is rarer and harder to find, worth the effort though IMO, I could never go back to purely vanilla.

 

Thanks, and you are correct. C-16 recognizes the status of rights completely regardless of gender or gender identity. I fully agree with that part. It is the right leaning leaders that are coming forward which recognizes, like every where in the world, a section of the population that moves further right based on fear of differences. My concern is when these further right individuals moves things like education and openness to diversity (race, social, religious, sexual) outside of the school system, we move backwards by decades at the swipe of a pen. We remove expression, discussion and, as a result, tolerance. There is an international movement to a greater divide between left and right, with a vacuum being created in the middle. This is appearing in Canada now, a country that has done a good job of separating state and religion and basic rights from financial policy. I fear a movement to make human legislation a part of government.

 

Understood!! I needed that smile this morning!! thanks.

 

thanks winstonmacgregor. I sit on a board for the Heart Institute. We are an elite hospital of research and application, among the top 6 or 7 in the world, and share that position with two institutes in the States, one of which is in Boston. A speaker from the hospital made comments that mirror your own. Hospitals are in fact squeezing the life out of many of their staff in the interests of profits. the impact on their effectiveness is a concern because the sharpness decreases with loads that you refer to. The push is patient over profit, the push back is from shareholders.