A Female Led political party

Mistress Lucy is right - the vast majority of politicians are male, through the generations I am afraid we have made a right mess of things. Too much macho flag waving, competitiveness, aggression. lack of compassion and understanding.

Come on Men admit we have messed up and willingly give Mistress Lucy the reigns and to lead and follow her policies.

 

You have my vote.

 

In the United States, policy and ideas do not get you elected. The ability to understand human behavior and use it to your advantage is what gets you elected. AOC and Trump are one in the same and where they are because both are great at it. The question is, who is more dangerous with that power, men or women?

 

I couldn't agree more.

 

The unemployment rate in the US is the lowest it has been since they began keeping records. Anyone in the US not working is NOT WORKING due to their own choice. Job postings can be found everywhere. I work 60+ hours each week and my 'vested & retired' wife still works 3 shifts at the hospital each week. No, lack of opportunity is NOT the issue. Laziness and entitlement are the problems. Work or starve.

 

Ask Cubans, Venezuelans and those who lived in the Soviet Union how radical leftist socialism works/worked for them. Go ahead, I'll wait.

 

Norway is a wealthy socialist country, don't confuse socialism and communism. Also Cuba and Venezuella are struck by international sanctions that have nothing to do with how they manage the economy of their country.

 

Then it would be a dick tatership.....

 

Wow, and thank you. I started working at 10. I put myself through school, university and my professional designation. That part we share. The rest we never will. I am not a religious person, but taking care of the sick, the poor and those in need is in the bible, the Koran, the Torah, all of the sadhanas, and virtually every humanitarian doctrine known to man. it is even on the platform of the Statue of Liberty. When we pass out essentials in a camp, we pass funds to the women because they will share with those in need. We give food parcels to the men because they do not do the cooking and want to be fed, so they share with women. We do not give money to the men because in third world cultures, money is held for wealth and self-interest rather than sharing with those in need. Interesting. I will simply wish you well and may your plate always be full, and may you never find yourself in need.

 

Number one, she should have considered the future possibilities before breeding beyond her capabilities to provide. Number two, find a job at a local daycare where daycare for her own children is a benefit. Number three, treat her own family well so that they may feel benevolent enough, should the need ever arise, to help watch the children while she works. Stop expecting strangers, who support government through taxation, to pay her way for the poor choices she made.

 

Why does one have to be more dangerous than the other?

Elizabeth Bathory, Ranavalona I, Irma Grese, Isabella I of Castile, Queen Mary I are just a few ruthless women who ruled nations.

I list these to support my claim that the RIGHT women need to be in charge. Some like AOC IMHO are clearly not right

 

I got mine, let others get theirs. I am not my brothers keeper.

 

I'm ok with most of it, but No MALE shall ever have an orgasm, flipping hell!! , I think that should be up to the individual Mistresses who decide their slaves fate. It is a bit like the OWK community, slaves were not allowed to walk on the paths but on the grass/gutters with numerous rules of behaviour and very harsh punishments, the 10 strokes of the cane in the factory story wouldn't even be a warm up .

 

No one said, in the Georgia election, that abortion rights would again be raised. No one said you should bring it to the Supreme Court because the Court structure has been changed. If being in power gives you the right to change course and bring in legislation that does not have an individual vote, then we open ourselves up to abuse, merely because someone is elected. When Hitler was elected, he talked about jobs and the need to maintain jobs in Germany while rebuilding. Yet being in power enabled him to lead extermination camps, remove human rights, ignore conventions pertaining to minimum standards of living and run horrible camps in which people lived in squaller, sleeping on concrete, no basic human cleaning essentials and no proper sleeping arrangements. Eighty years ago, Germany's parliament passed the "Enabling Act." From that point on, Adolf Hitler could enact laws without the need of parliamentary approval. No, Georgia NEVER said it would pass a law that removed all of individual rights over the bodies of women.

 

You are referring to women who ruled the way that they had to in order to survive in a barbaric existence though. An existence created by the men in the society who behaved like monsters, so they had to adjust to the reality of the world. Do you think that the barbarity of the Medieval times would have existed if women completely ruled the world? Do you think that a world run by women would have led us to any of the large scale conflicts like WW2 and such? Would a world run by women waste so much resources on weapons like Russia, China, and the U.S do?

 

I agree. Up to the males woman. I think what I was saying is no males would be allowed to orgasim IN the community except in designated areas. What you think?? Thanks.

 

Thank you, L-u-c-y. Sometimes I hope that the key breaks in the lock, thus stopping further propagation.

 

I’ve meet ruthless women in business
Some are many times more so than men

My point again is I’m all for women gaining power. I just want the right ones.

 

No, you are not. I do hope you get yours, and keep it. Things do go very, very wrong, hopefully only once in a Blue Moon. Bless you and your personal beliefs.

 

I understand what you are saying but these are women who are existing in the system that men created, a ruthless business culture that men created. They have to be everything that men are x5 in order to survive. Do you think that our business culture would be the same way that it is if women were running all of the executive offices? Would female run companies put peoples health and well-being at risk in order to increase a quarterly profit?

 

Well we as males would not get a say in the rules the community followed, and if already owned when going in would have to follow our Mistresses lead. But thats kind of hot really isn't it? I genuinely would like to explore this and it has been done as I said in the OWK (other world kingdom), I was in praque earlier this year near where they were based, unfortunately closed now or I would have visited or even stayed there. (harsher rules if your not a visitor).

 

well said. A man being aggressive is the equivalent to a women being a bitch, yet they are doing the same thing, just being reported on by men. Given the opportunity which also requires a female led board, changes can occur. It requires a shift in attitude, not just a single position, but it must start with single changes, one at a time.