Need some advise

Discussion in 'Chastity and orgasm denial' started by cnlh, Mar 28, 2013.

Random Thread
  1. cnlh
    Offline

    cnlh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Location: (Country, Region - and perhaps even City?):
    North Carolina
    Local Time:
    11:44 PM
    I currently have s cb6000s. I am farly tight balled they do hang but sometime they do get tight like normal. I like the cb6000s but sometimes it seems really uncomfortable and annoying I was wondering if a birldlock neo would be any better and easy to hide under clothes
     
  2. 2inch
    Offline

    2inch chasity,its for my own good

    Joined:
    May 15, 2012
    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Local Time:
    7:44 PM
    nope, iv been in both. the difference in one to the other is not worth your time or $ . id recomend going with a metal devive
     
  3. gweny
    Offline

    gweny Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    110
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location: (Country, Region - and perhaps even City?):
    Windhoek
    Local Time:
    12:44 AM
    i also can not wear devices ,i tried a lot of devices .in the end a real full chastity belt was the only answer !!
    most devices are a waste of money !!full belts are comfortable and easy to wear and conceal fantastic ..
    for more info feel free to send me a P/M
    best regards ..GWENY
     
  4. Droog
    Offline

    Droog Long term member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Local Time:
    7:44 AM
    cnlh: I have tried both the devices you mentioned. In my opinion - if you can fit into a the 6000s you're better off with the birdlocked mini. Its more of a hassle to put on, but more comfortable afterwards. The neo looks good, but the whole thing tends to flop down - its not really "adjustable" at all.

    You could also look at the new device (holy trainer) - that is easier and more comfortable to wear than the 6000s too. just tried it yesterday and it was fine overnight not sure whether I can recommend or not just yet.

    -droog
     
  5. ukshaver001
    Offline

    ukshaver001 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Local Time:
    12:44 AM
    My question on all of this is more about the night-time slippage when something attempts to rear its head. We have now tried a couple of devices and different ring sizes....... 45mm is almost too loose and 40mm is almost too tight...but wearing either still results in the metal device sliding down and allowing more growth space... so overnight I am often awoken with too much pressure/tightness on my balls.
    We dont like the look of the plastic devices... and are only into this as more fun than long-term...so not planning on paying out loads.
    Shame that the night factor is the only real let down
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice