As Owner of slave peter on here and elsewhere and of course in real life, I should like to ask members here about permanent long term chastity of male slave,s. Knowing there is a distinct line drawn between male slavery fantasy and fiction to real life male slavery to a Female and also where chastity is used by couples wishing to put a spark into their marriage there begs a question that is very often misconstrued regarding whether chastity is worthwhile in long term unconditional slavery of male,s to Female,s. let me put it this way, slave peter is on a long term unconditional slavery to me and has been permanently locked without relief, except being anally milked every three month,s. I don't allow any masturbation, nor self relief whatsoever and he never expels,s his filth without being in chastity. He knew this when he signed my contract and has never mentioned or begged to be released as he knows it would be pointless anyway. As he is 45 years old, his breeding days (if he had any) are well and truly over, not physically as I realise many males can still breed well after this age, However, he has chosen a life of servitude to me on his own free will and cannot escape, even if he wanted (at least not without dire consequences). The question is, (at the risk of being slated here) that should it be legal in this country why is not correct or sensible to have him castrated ? or rendered properly impotent? Now I know I risk all the stupid remarks on ethic,s and morality here, but my slave is quite happy to undergo this for me, and yes I can take him to Thailand or Mexico and have it done legally I know, it just seems rather silly and stupid. Lets face it, any male who is on here, single and without an Owner and is over the age of 40 are probably masturbating furiously and pretending to be chaste ! anyway. All males unowned or uncontrolled will masturbate incessantly as to them it is pure fiction or wank fodder. My view is once a male has decided on a life of slavery to a Female, then he basically gives up all rights to function as an intact male, unless his Owner decides he can. Some Female Owners want an intact male, I don't. And to perfectly blunt, keeping him locked and having to milk him occasionally is a chore I don't need or want. As a Female Supremacist, I find single males furiously masturbating over porn and the Female body very degrading and suggest that when a male is unowned, unmarried and over 40 they should be either castrated or put into permanent chastiy. vey controversial I know, my view only. Lady Debbie.
You are using a male's account to post as a woman. If not just a fantasy, I suggest you tell this to a professional who can give you the help you need. BTW, the stupid remarks are all yours. Now where is that ignore button...
Lady Debbie, wow! That is quite a view! Quite controversial, yes. I am recently divorced from a woman who cheated on me, but I had found out the only reason she had married me was to help raise her kids, though I loved her very much and it hurt me a lot. I never cheated on her. I have a girlfriend now who has embraced the D/s lifestyle, but just as a means to ensure that the spark we now have never leaves. I really don't want to suffer another breakup. While I do enjoy cumming and masturbating (and yes, I'm over 40), I have voluntarily given control of when, why, and how often I get to to my Amy. She enjoys the power very much as her previous mate IS a worthless scumbag who treated her terribly and really probably SHOULD be castrated. This facet of our relationship I feel is also something that will help her mind and self-image to heal and be strengthened as well. We both want to enjoy normal sex together as a happy couple, but again, under the auspices of her deciding when I will be allowed into her. I do not view this as purely fantasy or masturbation fodder, and only masturbate on those occasions I am allowed to by Amy, and that is usually while I am with her. Can't speak for all males over 40, but that's my honest story.
If your relationship with Peter is consensual, and symbiotic, what the heck, knock yourself out... As to all males who are not involved in your particular brand of kink, masturbating day and night, you are grossly exaggerating.
I'll add that this post sent my bullshit detector off the end of the scale, but as one who needs a little entertainment, I'll play along.
It does seem a bit odd, but yeah. If a man has no balls, he just becomes a eunuch. There is no sexual urge of any kind in him with which to control him with.
Surely the point of chastity is that the desire is there but the release is not...until allowed. Take the equipment away and, as OwnedByAmy correctly says: "...he just becomes a eunuch."
Hi I am in permanent chastity for 5 years because I can not satisfy my wife with my little sex. As I understood my situation and that I love my wife, I respect his decision. I emptied by milking every six months. Now, my only goal is the pleasure of my wife.
i enjoy the castration fantasy, and often ask my slave if he would willing have it done, or threaten him (fantasy} with it. telling him since his dicklet is unused, why does he need it. but it would take such pleasure away from both of us, as i so enjoy teasing and torturing it. im sure there are people that go to the extreme, and to each her or his own. for us, we will stick to the fantasy.
yes Ma,am it is a Ladies prerogative on this as a worthless male i believe this decision should be made by the Lady and the slave have no choice after all its all hers anyway
While the idea of being fully and totally owned is an amazing one, I will agree, something such as ~forced~ castration is itself in a different league. This is not something that can easily be undone and as such the response of "my Mistress wishes it" is a poor excuse for Consent. And if it is indeed not consensual, then it must not happen.
How about having one testicle removed? This seems a reasonable compromise. Your slave might become too weak to do heavy lifting around the house if he lost both. He could offer it to you as a symbol of his devotion.