Sometimes we wonder what could have been. Imagine chastity had gone wrong. You wanted to turn that vanilla wife into your goddess… she locked you up but that’s where it ended. Was this better than you had? That’s the scenario. Which would you prefer? Disclaimer: IB-Chaste’s pointlessly timed questions bear no affiliation to any posts related to King Hippos QotD. There may be other questions at other polls at other random times. You’re personal data will be stored for marketing purposes and will be shared all over the internet. Although there is some resemblance, IB-Chaste’s pointlessly times questions have no association with notbeinfringed85’s would you rather posts.
yes You rigt they am. but i pick the one i did cos you am all locked up and the other one you migt not be.
This was a difficult one to call. I'm in a sexless marriage and I tried the chastity experiment to spice things up. I ended up being locked and forgotten and at the time I thought it was the worst thing ever. At least without the cage on I could go back to masturbating when I needed to. I'd now pick the locked and forgotten option. I don't really want to masturbate as it feels like I'm a cheat and a failure. In hindsight I know I could cope now. I'm not totally free of jerking off but I can last a week or 2 before giving in and even then it's a bit meh so what's the point?
I’m still waiting for that journal post where chastity turns your sex life around… it’s going to happen. I can sense it! But yeah on the surface both options look very similar. When you think about it it’s actually a hard one to call.
Ew... this sounds like the party game where you have to decide between two terrible options and neither has a good outcome. I guess sexless marriage is better only because I'd be able to do something about it other than resent my wife. Being locked up comes with a certain degree of trust and duty, if she walked away from that it is better than I'm unlocked and keep my options open.
I voted "locked and forgotten" and to explain why I think I need to tell a little bit of my story. I was in a sexless marriage and then I discovered chastity. When I first started chastity the hormones and stuff were raging and I needed attention all the time, and at first it really did revive things between my wife and I, but then things settled down to maybe once a week, then that became once every 2 weeks, then once every 3. By that point, I was unlocked and to be honest, we both thought we were done with chastity, but I never went back to masturbating. I found that I was becoming very frustrated, I wasn't have sex very often and I wasn't masturbating, so I wasn't happy. Then the cage started calling me and I relocked, the main difference being that this time I was more experienced and I had a cage that was comfortable. Being locked, even though it was self-locked, I was content and didn't need more sexual attention than what was being offered, and in fact, the next time we had a sex session, I passed up an opportunity for an orgasm. If I'd still been unlocked, I would have got an O, but as my wife knew that my preference was to stay locked, she obliged. So, back to the original question, would I prefer to be unlocked and not getting any, or locked and not getting any, I would vote the latter.