If men were born like this...

The wife has control, regardless.

Her word has the ability to uplift or condemn.

The reward of her smile makes the day bright; my failure to bring her smile, cold rain.

Her command is a gift, her request, music, and she is the reward.

She is my device; my existence is hers. My physical self, inconsequential. She, monumental.

She is the standard. Whatever I am, it is because she allows. Because she inspires. Because she is.

I will pass as a candle, but a Goddess is eternal. I am fleeting. She is everything.

 

My mission is to make my mistress/wife/lover happy. Life has been tough for her, she deserves the peace and quiet, And seeing her smile is the best thing in the world.

I really hope more men experience this because I am certain, there are more woman that can use that aspect of love.

 

Wow Lucy, That is pretty absolute

Being the original poster suggesting men would be better with no penis or bits? But I congratulate you on inviting discussion after all this is a forum.

Mistress would agree with me, while we live the lifestyle and it is part of our lifestyle. It is an IMPORTANT part of our lifestyle not not the be all and end all. We have gone for LONG periods of time where we did not practice , and indeed we had times where we were very rocky. For us the lifestyle strengthens us and augments us. Isn't that what its meant to be about ?

For the most part my biggest gripe I have with her is we don't spend enough time with each other, not for scenes, not for sex, just for BEING with each other. I love being with her, the rest just follows.

We go to the beach and I love lying there admiring her sunbaking, mistress is in her 50s so not a pup but in my eyes she is perfect in her beauty , I love her smile when she spanks me, she truly smiles and enjoys it. And she loves the fact her cock is in a metal cage. Why would you suggest its all about what the man thinks ?

Why is is SO wrong to mix lust into every day life. why cant it be a strength? a generator, a motivator to be better.

It seems you have a very dim view on most men.

 

I don't think you can define it. Beauty can be described as many different things.

The dynamic as you well know is so variable. Its what works that matters.

I admit I am controlled more by mistress's happiness than anything else, that said my happiness is part of her component of happiness as well as it should be, it cant be a one way street, despite slave theory.

I don't know or understand why lust has to be bad thing. What is so wrong with it?

Chastity augments lust, it has to, its part of the mechanism, this is the chastity mansion after all.

If that is a bad thing then it should not be incorporated in the lifestyle.

 

A completely different aspect: replacement of worn out joints seems much easier... .

 

It certainly would make my panties fit better. But I'm pretty sure i'd still be inclined to submit to a Domme, as surrender doesn't solely rest on sexual denial.

 

I think the issue with lust is the selfishness involved with it. That it takes over you to such an extent that you must get what you want, when you want it, doing whatever you must to get it all while putting blinders on to the world around you and the consequences of your actions. You can have the same feelings but it a more positive way. You can look at L-U-C-Y’s photo of her in the captain marvel costume and get enchanted/drawn in to her aura without using her in a way that upsets her.

 

Right on.....

 

No, what I'm not saying isn't only about lust. I'm speculating about whether any of the things you mention (beauty of a woman's face, her smile, spending time alone with a beautiful creature) would have much influence at all if a man was born with absolutely no sex organs. No testosterone, no mating instinct, no particular attraction to the opposite sex at all. What difference would it make if the smile was that of a woman or a man? What would "attractive" or "beautiful" even mean?

 

No again. The point isn't that he couldn't appreciate anything beautiful, but that the woman wouldn't have any more influence than any of those things.

 

Music can make you smile and cry and that has no face of any gender, yet to produce emotions that strong from a person it shows a powerful ability to influence. So if music can do that why not a woman

 

You're certainly entitled to your opinion. But I see nothing to suggest why a person born totally sexless would necessarily be differentially influenced by "objectively" beautiful people of different genders.

 

Perhaps a woman has more going for her than a nice figure, a nice smile, or an ass. Perhaps a man is motivated by more than his cock.

That said, when her smile shines bright enough to illuminate a month ahead, and a flick of her hair winds him, he's hers regardless of a need for sex.

The grand canyon is still grand, whether one is in shape to hike it or not, and I can tell you from years of having lived there, it's majestic to the blind, as well. How could that be?

If a woman is a goddess, is she less divine if his dick shrivels and falls away?

God is god, regardless of whether someone chooses to believe in him. A woman is still divine, whether one stands a chance of scoring or not. Majesty may not be recognized by the beholder, but it's there, just the same. Perhaps it's just the wrong beholder.

 

without testosterone driving his behaviour and without a sexual impulse, which I think is what Miss Lucy is driving at, then yes, I think the world would be a better place. This wouldn't be a fetish, it would be a norm.

 

Man takes no responsibility for himself, but is a helpless slave to testosterone? We are strictly the product of our chemical composition?

This is disappointing. I thought I was so much more.

Rats.

 

I think it's really important that the male is born with his genitals intact. Wise women know, they have the power to overcome anything that the male gonads influence.

 

During the time I was married, I took anti antigens with the specific wish to decrease my sex drive, turn myself into a doll. It was indeed the reading of an account of a man in a similar position to me, his icon was in fact a doll with no bits coincidentally.

It was a sad part of my life.

I succeeding in effectively removing my parts but it left me feeling old, depressed, and yet still wanting the affection that just wasn't there. Even my finger nails broke!

While I concede what makes men men has many things to answer for, they are also what motivates and drives men to do a lot of good things as well. Would the world be a better place? No of course not. This forum simply would not exist. and the world would be full of menopausal men, just think of it lol.

I found I needed my fire, my drive to to motivate me to participate in life.

An imbalance in Mistress and my sex drive can still cause problems at times, Mistress knows everything about me, she would not allow me to go down that path ever again (although sometimes she jokingly threatens me, then to replace me with a strapon).

 

Except baldness

 

Yes that makes no sense to me either. There's more to life than just sex.

 

Especially if you can't play with yourself!!!

 

I'd think that once their usefulness was over (reproduction) men could have a full Penectomy.

 

Nah, that would completely remove what's most fun about chastity in the first place. Denial.

If men were born without cocks, we probably wouldn't even want sex to begin with, or even think of it for that matter.

Now what might be better is if men were born like this

That way, sex would still be possible (so denial would still be fun) and it might even work more or less the same as normal . . . but a woman could still take full control very, very easily . . . no cage required.