I know this is something that is not chastity related but is something that is worth browsing. let me know what you think. https://stealthformen.com
No way that's actually working on "growers". Using a ring behind the glans to hold onto a turtling penis is bound to fail. Also, their casual suggestion to keep the foreskin retracted for uncircumcised penises is ill advised.
I disagree with this. Given enough of a size difference between head and shaft and a tight enough ring behind that head, turtling isn't going to happen. The headlock cage I wear does not let the head go back through the ring - I haven't tried going naked in the snow to really test it vs extreme shrinkage, but under normal circumstances it has yet to happen.
Maybe I should have said "... bound to fail for me". We all talk about "growers" and "showers" like it is a binary thing but I guess it is more like a spectrum. In my case, anything that would be tight enough to restrain my glans when turtling (it is not like the penis corona is a stiff ridge either) would painfully strangle it when at the normal flaccid size. I suppose a circumsized penis could be stuffed in a tube that keeps everything close to its minimal size, but that's not my case: foreskin edema sets in after a couple of days and it gets really problematic if I try to push it beyond a week so, for long term, I have to use a cage that is sized for normal flaccid girth. This is not just theory. I tried many variations on such approaches (including slightly elastic silicone rings) years ago before finally settling for an intra-urethral retention approach.
well, your blanket statement really is much more narrow when you exclude the other 7+ billion people that aren't "you"
No need to be snarky. I though this was rational discourse. I suspect I am not particularly exceptional size/shrinkage-wise, and since you brought up the world population, consider this: the WHO estimated (in 2007) that 77% of males aged 15+ worldwide are uncircumcised. OK, maybe I should have stated: this device's turtling-prevention technology is bound to fail for pronounced growers, particularly uncircumcised ones.