Why the popularity of male chastity, or not, matters...?

So would it become LGBTQC+ if we add Chastity, lol ? Folks might think it's LGBT Quality Control, ha ha!

 

Well you can rest assured that some number of people North of 7 Billion are not in Chastity.

 

Exactly. It is interesting. It's not that I care how many. But, as Giles says....The more the merrier. Well that isn't exactly what he said.

 

Interesting. I've read that but still don't understand. So many labels! For me, its easier just "to be as I am"

 

Funnily enough, not everyone minds the idea of body scanners, and some like it.

My other half really likes the idea of me going through a scanner wearing it... hasn't happened yet.

 

What? Another grouping? The world is confusing enough.. we dont need another classification.. i mean, im a male, with a penis, albeit unable to erect since being caged/locked.. i dont need special preferential treatment.. ok, airport security..? We travel overseas couple of times.. the cage is on the luggage.. wanking on air while the entire cabin is wobbling..? Come on…
I dont have genital piercings… hows that with security checks..?

 

Nope I have no connection to LBGTQ or anything else like it and have no wish to be "identified" as anything in particular. True I'm a consenting adult who is kept locked in chastity by his wife (key holder). It is granted, a "bit odd or kinky" I suppose. But it's very good fun. I personally don't care a jot about people's creed, colour or sexual orientation. When it comes to sexual orientation, it's entirely up to the individuals concerned how they choose to live their lives. Me, I'm just a boring old hetro and very happy to be so. It's much more important to just be nice person. I think that was a bit of rant there! Sorry!

 

The jokers, the smokers and the midnight tokers may have an even better case (if we see them as a social minority, albeit a large one) for wanting to be considered "normal", and accepted by the rest of society, though of course we range across the whole SLGBTQC+ spectrum.

We are criminalised in more parts of the world than any other minority for non-immoral acts. Admittedly, more so if you don't happen to be white and or middle class.

Most would rather pay tax on their purchases, and not have to deal with the seedy underworld that they will inevitably come in to contact with.

 

I don't really care if it's popular or not, mostly because we will never reach a stage where chaste men are the norm, and girls all know we are all wearing cages, and it's normal for them to talk about it, make fun of it, point it out etc. That's the stuff of fantasy fiction.

With that said, it would be fine with me if were at least a non-issue, though, similar to the way "everyone" knows what condoms are for and no one particular cares. Or if TSA were to see one on their scanner they would ignore it like a plate in your knee or something. That would be nice. Just to not be looked at as a kinkster or a weirdo if someone found it about it would be cool

But it is a sex thing, so it's not likely to come up in conversation with grandma, so at the end of the day it's a private matter.

 

Acceptance. “Oh you do this too? I’m not alone then”. Part of this entire site is about finding common ground with others that share an interest.

Not being alone is part of the human condition, even if one wants to be “special”, it’s with the underlying understanding that they aren’t the only special ones. Peer groups are valued and sought after, whether it’s friendships, coworkers, or hobbies.

 

100% this.

It’s part of my identity. I’ve felt lost without it. Finding common ground is rewarding.

I don’t want others to feel alone either.

That’s why we’re here.

 

I’m going to give tsa something to talk about this summer with a trip from Florida to New Jersey. I plan on wearing my ht nub through security. I don’t imagine it will be an issue but could be interesting.

 

I'm flying with my Wife in a few days and she intends to unlock me for security and then relock me before we board the plane. I've thought it's probably easier to just go through the scanner locked. Supposedly, their 'algorithms' can detect chastity devices and ignore them. Supposedly.

 

You should ask her to leave you locked and report back what happens. The absolute worst case should be that their metal detectors detect it (if you have a metal cage) and they take you to a private room so you can show them, but in all likelihood, even if they detect it, they won't do anything.

 

If you pass through a scanner with a hard surface beneath your clothing (cage, not what's in it), you'll be subject to secondary screening. No one is going to order you to remove the cage.

I'm passing through a security checkpoint once or twice a day or more, typically, and when I'm at an airport or a secure area, I don't wear it. I understand that those who are more committed, and who don't remove theirs, wouldn't want to remove it when passing security.

I remove the device to travel or enter a security area. When I reach a destination, I wear the device, and notify my wife that it's on, and likewise when preparing to go again, I notify her that it's removed.