@L-u-c-y shared a really good article on 'Did the Victorians have it right?' https://www.chastitymansion.com/forums/index.php?threads/did-the-victorians-have-it-right.30914/ A piece showcasing Victorian research into the poor results of males who indulged in this practice. The thing i find interesting and not brought out in the article; why such practices affect males in one way, but in Females completely the opposite? Is it a physiological thing or emotional, or just that higher volumes of Female sexual arousal generates more positive energy than male? Back in my hey day (like really going back) i recall post coital energy for me as being 'in my boots' but my wife's, through the roof. Mistress Lucy poses the question; if the Victorians had access to male chastity, what wonders of the world would be in place today? Well i think another paradigm could be considered that goes with that; Coupled with a Matriarchal Society, with males in chastity? Who knows!