I will design your dream cage

It would be different for everyone. My opinion would be device that has possibility to add cables/harness to keep it close to body. No gaps for loose skin but mesh design to keep clean. Maybe not even ball ring at all.

 

A version of the Lori 2A with the retaining ring (non-piercing) at a working man's price.

 

Yes. That is correct, provided it pivots in the same manner as the Lori's (rather than only being stationary) and is a good wearable material (in my head, a bio resin like the Holy Trainer would be ideal).

 

Something keep foreskin rolled back so able to wash without taking cage off.
Good luck with that one.

 

Agreed. I really thought of this for a long time.

 

The retaining ring doesn't only prevent getting back in the cage, if installed in a properly designed cage (one that doesn't allow enough access to defeat the retaining ring), it prevents pullout in the first place.

 

Alternatively, and maybe preferably, you could include a base ring (like a typical trapped ball device) and the cables would lock onto that, keeping it snug against the body.

 

My dream cage would be the same shape as the holytrainer "the nub" but a little smaller (like 15-20mm internal length and maybe 20mm internal diameter). And also "open" like this https://www.houseofdenial.com/colle...teel-hod-s75-ultra-small-male-chastity-device

 

Wow, that is sleek, futuristic. Cool.

 

It would help if somehow the base ring could be adjustable in size, so you could tighten or loosen it slightly to ensure a better fit. Seems a proper fitting ring is often the biggest issue to long-term wearing of chastity cages.

 

Wow that's actually quite attractive, I like it.
It looks like it could be the front plate of a full belt.
I assume that is a rendering, what material do you plan to use?
Could you do a PA secured tube only version?

 

I've tried a lot of cages, and their lack of security comes from two situations, which I don't think can be solved if it's not with a belt.

1º - At the back of the cage, it will always be possible to push this and allow to remove the penis by pulling the skin. The only possibility for this not to happen is to make it impossible to access from the back. Some belts on the market already have good solutions, but in a cage it will be difficult to solve this issue.

2º - A hard ring will never guarantee perfect safety, because if it allows the testicles and penis to enter, it will also allow them to leave always. The ideal will be a ring that can be tightened afterwards after placed.

I would love to have a female type belt, which could be "fastened" to my body, having a ring added to it. In this way, the cage would be locked directly in the belt and not on the ring, ensuring much greater safety.

The belt adapted to the body, would have to safeguard access from the back, still allowing it not to need to be removed whenever the keyholder desired, removing only the cage.

 

1) While a waist belt or piercing are the obvious solutions to the pullout problem, there may still be hope for others. Lori's devices address this with a pivoting internal security ring that clamps down on the penis when it is pulled backward. Worth a look.

2) I agree, and would prefer a base ring that is hinged or in two pieces so that it can be tightened behind the genitals. People complain that hinged rings pinch, but that should be avoidable if they are machined properly and there aren't gaps big enough for skin to get caught. A hinged or two-part ring also makes it much easier to put on.

 

Real promising, i have a lot ot curiosity to know the design, even try it if you allow us

 

I got 3d printer too, but I'm novice in 3d design. I tried some models found on thingiverse and cults3d and modified them, but they are not good.

 

Sounds really good but would want the PA hook

The one we'd prefer that we are saving up for is the 2D.

So a version of the Lori 2D. with the PA hook and the wider gaps filled with an extra bar would be great
or much more narrow bars all round this would facilitate fairly thorough cleaning without removal.
The upper part of the cage can be removed using one key to allow completely thorough cleaning or inspection ... whatever whilst the A-ring and lower part of the cage remain in place secured by the PA hook. A different key would needed to unlock the PA hook and the A-ring/lower cage section.

That key could be totally withheld whilst the other key that enables removal of the upper section only could be held secured in your own customary way for use only with permission.

The access for cleaning/inspection whatever that this cage provides would enable one to be permanently locked in a hygienic way. The narrow bars would allow for no direct stimulation.

I have another idea too that i will attempt to post when I have more time

 

WOW take my money filltee