Covid-19 and Life

and petty

 

evil

 

not in my body

 

finally!!

 

Looking at the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports, I realized that in the past I used the number of adverse reports for the entire world, but then used the number of dosages administered for only the US when calculating percentages. The percentages were less than 1%, even using the total VAERS count.

The number of adverse events is extremely high, based on passed experience, but then they have never vaccinated 70% of the world's population in a short period.

When I chose to be vaccinated in the first half of 2021, I didn't see evidence of a great number of deaths or injury, so assumed the vaccine was relatively safe, in the short term. I was over fifty, and in the gray area as far as risk. Had I children, would I have vaccinated them, no. It is still an experimental medical treatment.

We now know they were suppressing reports of adverse events, wanting to vaccinate as many people as possible.

As I have said before, these are cold unfeeling numbers. If you know a person who has experienced an adverse event or died, I don't mean to appear dismissive or to minimize the consequences.

Based on the number of vaccine doses administered, there is 1 to 4 adverse reports per 1,000 persons receiving a vaccine dose. This is a relatively low number, so like me, you may have no personal experience with anyone experiencing an adverse event. There are reports of bad batches of vaccine, which may explain why some people know multiple people who have experienced an adverse event. I also know a small number of people.

Some say only a small percentage of adverse events have been reported, and that some reports have been deleted. As I saw in a video earlier today, recorded in 2021, Dr. Malone and others said the numbers can't be significantly higher or we would be hearing reports from mortuaries, which we weren't at the time.

I've included the total number of VAERS reports in 2019 to demonstrate the extreme increase in the number of yearly reports.



The total numbers for US VAERS shown below are alarming.

To keep deaths in perspective, about 9,500 people die each day in the US, on average. If you are vaccinating the elderly and the at risk populations, a certain number were likely going to die in the following few days.



I just looked at the number of dosages administered weekly, and the majority were done in 2021. I then overlaid the number of weekly deaths. It isn't a perfect alignment, but the number of deaths spiked when the vaccination rate was at is highest. This may be a coincidence, as there wasn't a matching spike in deaths with the second spike in doses. Orange is doses of vaccine, Red is number of deaths.




And COVID-19 is still out there, but not nearly as prevalent and deadly as it was.

 

Sounding more and more like controlled opposition every day.

 

Ex-Communist News Network (CNN) President Jeff (Cock) Zucker Ordered Staff To Ignore Lab-Leak Theory

​

Fox News is reporting:

“... in the early months of the pandemic, then-CNN president Jeff Zucker would not allow his network to chase down the lab-leak story because he believed it was a "Trump talking point," according to a well-placed CNN insider.”

Brings a whole new meaning to, “ ... don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.”




See:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/credi...ed-staff-not-chase-down-covid-lab-leak-theory

​

 

I had a closer look at the spike in deaths that coincided with the peak in vaccine doses being administered, in early April 2021.

The CDC data I present on "All Cause" deaths indicates there were 450 excess that week, but no excess deaths the week prior and after. There were 60,998 deaths that week, with 60,548 expected.

This is a clear chart showing the number of weekly deaths and vaccine doses, with details of the spike in deaths on April 7, 2021 presented.

It is no small feat to have administered almost 23 million vaccine doses in a single week. I just looked at my shot card and see I received my first dose on April 23, 2021, the second a month later. On December 6, 2021 I was diagnosed with COVID-19. :-(



This chart shows the trend in excess deaths throughout the pandemic. This indicates only 132 excess deaths, or 0.2%, for the week April 10, 2021.

 

what a con job!

 

Let’s hope his comeuppance isn’t merely an unflattering Newsweek article.

 

The drum beats for accountability are getting louder. Watch:

Hilton: We need to Anthony Fauci accountable



“ ... This Is Not The China Virus ... If Anything It Is The Fauci Virus ...”​

 

SO MUCH FOR THAT CONSPIRACY THEORY
as
According To A Just Released Major Poll More Than HALF In The US Now Say The Chinese Coronavirus Started In A Lab
​

• Trump was once derided for saying the 'Wuhan virus' came from a lab;
• Now, that view has gone mainstream and is accepted by most Americans; and
• It crept over the half-way mark after a turnaround last week by the U.S. Energy Department.

“... You Can Fool Some Of The People Some Of The Time ... But You Can’t Fool All Of The People All of The Time ...”​

See:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...former-conspiracy-theory-goes-mainstream.html

 

Yup

 

This week's Excess Deaths data.

This is for All Cause; natural, accidents, homicides, suicides, etc. The natural cause data is compiled more rapidly than the others.

There are 7,370 additional All Cause deaths in this update.

The first chart shows the number of All Cause and Natural Cause deaths since 2014.



This is the data and chart for All Cause Deaths 2014 to present. The second chart is only Disease Deaths.



First is data and chart for Excess Deaths. The second chart is for only Disease Deaths, which excludes the categories that are more incomplete.

Based on the five year average, 2015-2019, there were 124,374 excess Non-Covid disease deaths in 2022, up from 81,621 in 2021. Based on my calculation of expected deaths, which is based on the trends in deaths between 2015 and 2019, there were 67,012 excess deaths in 2022. All Cause deaths were trending up each year prior to Covid (see above charts), so using the average overstates the number of excess deaths 2020-2022.

 

"How likely is a lab leak?

"A 1995 epidemic of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus is believed to have come from a lab. A 2003 case of SARS was traced back to a Singapore lab. Multiple cases of SARS in 2004 in Beijing likely originated in a lab, a World Health Organization report found. A 2007 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease was believed to come from a UK lab. In 2002, cases of West Nile Virus were acquired in labs. In 1979 more than sixty people, who lived downwind from a Soviet military facility, died from anthrax that escaped from the building. In 2019, a lab leak of aerosolized Brucella in China infected more than 10,000 people. "
​

Is Gain-of-Function Research a ‘Risk Worth Taking’? Or ‘Insanity’?

 

Fauci's Lies Exposed... Jim Jordan Goes Ballistic Over Scientists' Lab-Leak Flip-Flop



Dr John Campbell: Vaccine research rushed?








He also looks at CDC recommendations, which is for children 6 month old and older.

 

RUSSELL BRAND
Stream of Consciousness on Chinese Coronavirus
With Tucker Carlson



Not long ... Very Enlightening ... Worth Your Time!



​

 

By March 11, 2020, The Herd had started to Stampede, and well, the politicians and bureaucrats had to go with the flow, or be run over.

Who triggered the Stampede? The media chasing ratings with fear porn, and individuals doing the same on Social Media. Humans as a group always seem to be on the verge of panic, and this is why they are easily controlled by fear, and politicians are notorious cowards; they don't actually stand for anything that doesn't benefit them directly. A couple years ago Glenn Beck called Republicans "Spineless Jellyfish," but the label applies to most politicians, especially those who make a lot of noise.

Politicians wont sacrifice themselves, their career, for the sake of the community.

Did China's government stir the pot of fear, or sit back and watch it boil over?





Covid ‘Not Deadly Enough’ to Justify Risk of Fast-Track Vaccines, Chris Whitty Told Government

 

PFI$ER’S FRAUDULENT TRIALS

​

From 'cooking' and falsifying trial data to conveniently dropping subjects who suffered adverse events, including deaths, from the data, there's no question Pfizer's vax trials were a sham. Will this BIG PHARMA crook - who earned a record $100 billion in 2022 - ever be stopped and brought to justice? I doubt it!

• Die Welt, a mainstream media outlet in Germany, revealed that numerous subjects who suffered adverse events, including deaths, during Pfizer’s Chinese Coronavirus shot trials were removed from the trial data;
• A person known as “Pfizer subject C4591001 1162 11621327” died three days after receiving the second dose of Pfizer’s Chinese Coronavirus shot, reportedly due to stroke and arteriosclerosis; it was deemed unrelated to the shots;
• The CDC has since warned that people ages 65 and older who received Pfizer’s updated (bivalent) Chinese Coronavirus booster shot may be at increased risk of stroke;
• Die Welt also revealed contradictions in Pfizer documents, adverse events from the shot downplayed and mass unblinding of study subjects, which wasn’t revealed in a later approval study;
• In November 2020, Pfizer claimed their Chinese Coronavirus shot was 95% effective against the WuFlu, but this was highly misleading and based on flawed methodology, including excluding people who got Chinese Coronavirus within 14 days after their first shot; and
• Pfizer has profited immensely despite the concerns, earning a record $100 billion in 2022, including $37.8 billion for its Chinese Coronavirus shots and $18.9 billion for its antiviral drug Paxlovid.

See:
https://media.mercola.com/ImageServ...DF/how-pfizers-trials-were-fraudulent-pdf.pdf

​

 

Sorry, the truth must not get in the way of our objective, and profits.

How much money is the CDC and FDA making off corporations, which in turn helps pay their salaries? No conflict in interest? Fauci made $5 million during Covid.







"Lets slip our political enemies in with an enormous pile of trash, and let them be disposed of too."

They have spent a lot of time and effort, and tax payer money, to create the infrastructure to do just that.




https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1633830002742657027

 

THE ESTEEMED LITTLE ELF’S DARKEST DAY – CAUGHT IN BRIBERY SCHEME TO SAVE HIS SKIN – Repeatedly Lied on Chinese Coronavirus Origins – PAID OFF DOCTORS – Former CDC Chair Dr. Redfield Testifies, Confirms All
​

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield confirmed during testimony yesterday that he was excluded and kept out of the loop by The Esteemed Little Elf in early February 2020 after he suggested the Chinese Coronavirus was leaked from a laboratory and did not act like a naturally occurring SARS coronavirus.

Dr. Redfield believed WuFlu came from a lab so The Elf excluded him from phone calls early on as he persuaded other doctors to side with him by handing out millions of dollars in research grants.

The only thing that changed was the BRIBES and NOT THE SCIENCE!

Chairman Jim Jordan was ON FIRE – questioning Dr. Redfield about the origins of the Chinese Coronavirus virus during the House Coronavirus Committee.

“... Nine Million Reasons to Change Your Mind– ...”

Transcript from the video below:

“JORDAN: Dr. Redfield, you ran the CDC and you were on the Coronavirus task force, is that right? That was formed on January 29, 2020, is that right?

REDFIELD: Correct.

JORDAN: Two days later, Dr. Fauci gets an email from Dr. Andersen which says what? The virus looks engineered, the virus is not consistent with evolutionary theory. Is that accurate?

REDFIELD: That’s my understanding from what I’ve read.

JORDAN: Did he share that email with you? As a member of the task force and head of the CDC, did he share that email with you?

REDFIELD: No.

JORDAN: Next day, February 1, Dr. Garry sent Fauci another email saying, “I don’t know how this happens in nature but it would be easy to do in a lab.” Did he share that email with you?

REDFIELD: No.

JORDAN: You didn’t see either one of those emails, even though you’re head of the CDC? Even though you’re on the Coronavirus task force that had been formed just two days earlier?

REDFIELD: No.

JORDAN: Three days later, Dr. Andersen and Dr. Garry, who told us it came from a lab in emails to Dr. Fauci that Dr. Fauci wouldn’t let Dr. Redfield see, three days later they change their position 180 degrees. The question is why.

Mr. Wade, why would they chang their position that fast, when the only intervening event is a conference call with Dr. Fauci, the guy who wouldn’t let Dr. Redfield see the very emails that they had sent him, Dr. Redfield, head of the CDC, on the Coronavirus task force, why would they change their position, Mr. Wade?

NICHOLAS WADE, FORMER “SCIENCE” MAGAZINE EDITOR: This question does lay at the heart of the issue. What is pertinent it seems to me is there is no new scientific evidence that we can see that became available between these dates.

So you have to ask if there were other kinds of influence available.

Now, it is true that Dr. Fauci and [British expert] Dr. Farrar in London were very powerful research officials… I don’t know what the reason was… If you’re looking at the timeline on May 21, just a few weeks after the Nature Medicine article had come out, two of the signers of the original email to Dr. Fauci, that is Dr. Andersen and Dr. Farry, were rewarded a $9 million grant for the–

JORDAN: So there are nine million reasons why they changed their mind. I knew you’d get to it, I read that last night. Three days after they say it came from a lab, they change their position and the only intervening event is a conference call with Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins. Again, a call that Dr. Redfield was not allowed to be on, the head of the CDC and on the Coronavirus task. And then three months later, shazam, they get nine million bucks from Dr. Fauci. Well isn’t that something?”

Watch:
https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1633515940204691456

​

 

why is "the data" always such BS?

 

Because MONEY.