An A.I. picture and Caption thread

Meh, not the worst looking hands we've seen. I mean, you can at least recognize them as hands. :-\

It's the "totally ignoring almost everything" part that cracked me up. That's why I had to save it.

 

Such a waste of electrical energy, increasing global warming. Computers will always be resticted to plagiarize.
I will always be curious about human creativity. Go on guys. Did a girl made a caption ever?

 

Computers, and the software that runs on them, are tools. An artist may be better able to refine his vision using better tools, but without the spark of creativity they are just electronic hammers.

 

Hang on; a computer created that image based on a very short text prompt and you believe it's hilariously bad? It got a few things wrong but compared to even two years ago it's astounding.

 

The world needs to see.

 

It's really not. Computers have been generating art for decades. Generative sentences and images are just derivatives, without humans they would generate noise and nothing more. Impressed thoght you may be, it's just a new fangled mechanical turk.

Don't forget what Clarke said; Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

 

a stern librarian looks disapprovingly at the camera (MidJourney) Did okay on the hands for the second one. Even, ha, made her ring finger longer than her index finger, so the guy is probably not getting unlocked very often.

 

A female body builder poses with her husband (MidJourney) Of course, this one gave him six fingers...

 

The computer could NEVER give us Danica Collins. Unless you asked for Danica Collins.

Excellent choice, btw.

 

Here's one of them.

 

hehe, she is hot...but ugh, the hands are always so scary haha.

 

My main 'issue' with the AI generated pics I'm seeing on bdsmlr and the like are the women are too perfect, too pretty. It makes them almost sexless looking. There's an uncanny valley there.

 

Attractive, curvy dark skinned, Mature black woman, sitting in a chair in a modern living room. She is wearing an open white Oxford shirt with the collar turned up. She has long hair pulled back in a ponytail. Her legs are bare, she is not wearing pants. She stares seriously at the camera. She holds a riding crop in one hand.

 

And these are very binary features. White blouse or not. Hair pulled back or not. Both legs exposed or not.

Just imagine if you said “pronounced vulva with a normally sized clitoris showing a mid level arousal”. Or, “large very soft but shapely breasts where the nipples are neither distinctly pink nor brown”.

Let’s face it, even the aspect ratio of her pubic landing strip needs to exhibit the “golden ratio” or it doesn't look as attractive.

 

which sites are you using to create these? Please include that in the post.

 

You can clearly see the "ImagineGo" in the upper right, and how it's a phone screenshot.

BTW, Imagine did not allow me to create NSFW images. ImagineGo alolows it, although it displays a warning screen first. However, I have not tried to create anything seriously NSFW.

 

I'm using MidJourney. It is pretty locked down as far as NSFW goes.

 

A woman dressed as a traditional English maid holds a tray (MidJourney). Of course the servants know all that goes on in the house...

 

Some of the banned words can be funny. With Midjourney at least, you can specify "style of..." and list one or more artists and it will attempt to mimic their style. There's an artist who goes by the name "Shag" and when I tried "a cocktail party where the men are serving their wives; style of Shag" it rejected that because "shag" is a banned word. How Austin Powers of them... so I redid it with his real name and it worked:

A cocktail party where the men are serving their wives; style of Josh Agle"

 

it's improving all the time though. a lot of the issues you're seeing now will be fixed over the coming months.