I've been locked now for 11 months and it is 6 months since I was permitted to empty my balls. Mistress, my keyholder, is getting concerned that this may harm my prostate and is thinking of allowing them to be emptied again. Does anyone have evidence that prolonged chastity and not being allowed to ejaculate can harm the prostate gland?
So true. I need to do this. I’ve had a few friends have prostrate issues and need to discuss getting checked with my Dr. as I’m at the age I should be checked. Mine is really cool and knows I’m bi and kinky. So it’s no big deal. But I’m still a bit nervous. In fact, it’s silly as she had to check me about six months ago when I had a minor hemorrhoid issue. She just didn’t check my prostrate. So all I can offer OP is to suck it up. Most doctors are familiar with kinks and alternative sexuality. We often make a bigger deal than it is. So just be respectful, don’t make it about you using them for your kink and just have a open and honest discussion.
FFS, this story about frequent ejaculation leading to lower rates of prostate cancer went around the internet a few years ago, and everyone latched onto it as an excuse to masturbate excessively and feel good about themselves. Yes, some studies found a correlation between frequent ejaculation and lower rates of prostate cancer. I can't argue with that. However, that does not mean the opposite is true, and there is absolutely nothing to imply causation. In other words, there's little-to-no evidence that ejaculating less frequently poses a health concern. Some excerpts from the Huffington Post article on the 2016 study at the Boston University School of Public Health... Men at the very low end of ejaculation – 0 to 3 times per month – were more likely to have other (medical problems) and die prematurely from causes other than prostate cancer” -Dr. Jennifer Rider, who did the analysis while working at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston One limitation of the study is that it relied on men to accurately recall and report how often they ejaculated. The study also included mostly white men, and it’s possible the results might look different in a more diverse population. The apparent protective effect of high ejaculation frequency was seen mainly in reduced numbers of low-risk forms of prostate cancer...“If ejaculation frequency was truly a causal factor for prostate cancer development, we would expect to find the association across all prostate cancer risk categories." -Dr. Behfar Ehdaie, a urology specialist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York who wasn’t involved in the study "Frequent ejaculation through sex or masturbation probably results from other factors that contribute to good health, such as a healthy diet and normal weight, which might also lower the risk of cancer." -Dr. John Gore, a urology researcher at the University of Washington in Seattle who wasn’t involved in the study Other studies did not establish the same correlation, and some even showed contradicting results. Since ejaculation is a normal bodily function, there are probably many benefits to doing it every so often. But I don't think there's any reason why you feel like you should have to. And last but not least, there has been ZERO scientific research involving the long term use of chastity devices. If anything, you're probably more likely to cause damage by constantly poking around at your prostate instead of just letting your body do its thing.
Agreed, talk to a professional if you are truly concerned, what do a bunch of humps know for sure on a chastity message board. That said, there may be many factors in any study. Perhaps the high frequency of cancer in men who only ejaculate 0-3 times per month is due to age?? A 70 year old human body is much different than a 40 year old human body....Take any study with a grain of salt.
Thanks, personally I feel fine I was just sending out a feeler. There is nothing out there to suggest either way. As you say it is opinion
Ah, I'm sorry about that. My "FFS" was directed at how the study spread like wildfire. I wouldn't call it misinformation or "fake news", but it's frustrating to see the way in which people ran with it. Now we in the chastity community have to deal with the question coming up all the time. Though it's still not as bad as people asking if chastity causes permanent shrinkage (very much another FFS-inducing question lol). I'm curious why you asked then. Even if one or two people on this website experienced prostate issues, that wouldn't be enough to draw a conclusion.
I asked as the question came up in the relationship between myself and my keyholder. Having researched the issue online including the NHS sites amongst others there seemed to be no definitive conclusion,so I was curious to know the opinion of others on here. Granted not many will be doctors or in the medical profession but experience is sometimes a good guide.
Ever since menopause, Mistress no longer enjoys PIV sex, so, likewise, I am not permitted to orgasm. To prevent my having any plumbing problems as a result, Mistress occasionally milks me to drain me and to keep me "docile" as She calls it. Her gloved and lubed finger can get my juices flowing in a few seconds and I get emptied without ejactulation of orgasm. I fine this level of control that She has over me humiliating and is serves remind me further of my submissive state.
And it can be done while you remain locked I takes a little longer and it just dribbles out and is maddening at leas it was for me and done a long time ago i was wearing a birdlocked ... Haven't tried it in the steel that I am currently locked in
Yeah my wife doesn't mind playing around with prostate milking while I'm locked, but it's never going to be a regular or scheduled thing. Neither of us see it as something that's necessary.
@HisFreakySide is absolutely right that the oft-quoted study is very weak, and cannot be relied on at all. I asked my GP several years ago about medical issues associated with chastity / denial and his initial response was that apart from mechanical issues (abrasion of the skin, crushing of vital blood vessels, etc) he was not aware of any issues. Next time I saw him, he said he had done a little research, and again had come up with nothing. There is a subjective idea that 'full balls' or 'unused plumbing' is a bad thing, but the body just sorts these things out. BTW, the idea that a man's testicles are 'full of semen' just waiting to be released is very wrong. Testes are a complex and 'meaty' semen factory, not a cavernous semen repository, and the amounts produced and briefly stored are tiny. The amount of semen in a typical ejaculation is less than 0.5ml, which would fit in this spoon.
For what it's worth: before you knew anything about how your dick worked did you ever have "a wet dream" that is how your body releases the unused protein that builds up. So with that being said being locked is no different. I drip into my panties after about 2 hours and then continues but kind of cycles with my excitement level. When very excited continuously pre cum dripping this is when I am giving her an o bout n hour later still dripping but not as hard body is expelling what it don't need. Any extra over that the body will digest. Hope this helps
I did 6 months and found a few things. At about month 5, I had a reduction in pre-cum leaking. On emptying, things were pretty thick, and a bit off colour. Took about 3 more empties to get back to normal. I found that there was not much change in ability to pee, which was what I was using as a guide. At about 6 months, I had what I think may have been a bladder infection, but just in case, we had me empty myself by way of masturbating. I also have, according to my doctor, and an older ultrasound, at least one kidney stone that's not moved in years. This may also have been the cause of the bladder issue if it did move, and I did have some back pain at the time. Basically, I did 6 months, had no wet dreams, and no ejaculations. Noticed changes in output at 5 months. Had some sort of inflammation issue that is now fully resolved, and didn't seem to be an inflamed prostate, but since it cleared up, I didn't pursue it further. Semen was thick and off coloured, as I've found at 3 months in the past. It was a profound experience for me though, and I'm glad I did it. Back to one empty a month for now...ruined of course. Emptying from 6 months, I had to get a full orgasm to really clear stuff out. Didn't want a half hearted dribble. Didn't enjoy the masturbating, or the orgasms, which is part of what was so profound about being totally shut down for half a year. My keyholder loves that I don't enjoy it anymore. Good luck to you, and let us know how it goes.
For what it's worth, remember also that men who have had a vasectomy don't 'explode' one day. That tiny amount of sperm is routinely reabsorbed by the body. And precum is often secreted by a different gland (Cowper's glands) than the prostate.
1st sperm takes 60 days to mature so your sperm factory functions based on the last 90 days of use. what is not used is reabsorbed and used to make new sperm. if your sexually activity suddenly increases your body compensates by reducing the amount of sperm in each ejaculation. 2nd pre cum has nothing to do with cum. it is a lubercant made by the bulbourethral glands. you can leak out as much as you like it will not effect your ejaculate. 3rd the prostate is a gland that makes up about 30% of your ejaculate. if you go from no sex to sex 3 times a day it will take it a week or two to catch up production with need. so there will be less ejaculate for a while. 4th and most important is the prostate is a muscle and like all muscles it atrophies with lack of use. it is the muscle along with your pelvic floor muscles that gives the power behind your ejaculation. it's basic biology. 5th. milking a prostate does not exercise the prostate. it merely drains prostate fluid and seminal vesicles fuild with no force required. if you tease ahead of time then milk sperm will be included in suffient amount to use for insemination. lastly prostate cancer has more to do with genetics, diet, exercise along with smoking, drugs and alcohol. remember almost everything that enters the blood stream goes past the prostate on the way out.
More information can be found here: https://www.livescience.com/32751-what-does-the-prostate-gland-do.html I draw your attention to the last sentence: Although the myth that frequent ejaculation may reduce the risk of prostate cancer has flourished in popular culture, there's no scientific evidence that this is true, according to the Mayo Clinic.
Interesting. Can you cite sources please? I’m not doubting you, but an authoritative source is much better than saying someone on CM posted.