What is the end goal of online chastity?

She might be, or she might not be. She's sent the odd picture and it's usually the same person. Could be her... Could equally be someone pretending to be the girl in the images.
On the same token she doesn't necessarily know I'm a man or that I'm locked.

 

So you are saying because she doesn't want to get verified that she's a guy?? Man, I get you are cynical, you have probably had thousands of guys only want want want from you and I get it. But because you are like that, doesn't mean everyone is. And because she doesn't want to verify doesn't make her a guy.

 

The problem with putting words in others mouths is that when you presume to speak for them, you stop listening to what they have to say. The presumption that others can't speak for themself is rather limiting.

Without presuming to think for Ms. L-U-C-Y, I took her comment to mean that she'd welcome the perspective of another woman on the website, and offered up that invitation. Your take on her comment is rather cynical, isn't it?

 

I had that take also but the tone of the entire thread and her next response made me think otherwise.

She gave up 4 examples of an online woman accepting a key to hold of a male:

"1. Male approaches next female, and the next, and the next, ad infinitum.
2. Male approaches a man pretending to be a woman, who loves the idea.
3. Male approaches a pro domme and pays for a service.
4. Male finds 1 in 100 million woman who enjoys holding a strangers key for the hell of it."

So you tell me if I am being cynical that I don't think she was saying that I found 1 of 3 women in the entire United States of America.

 

You haven't provided a reference for your 1:3 ratio, but your quote of the four stipulations suggests that perhaps you have located one in one hundred million.

Congratulations.

It appears that she's been extended an invitation to register here and participate.

 

Listen, I'm done arguing over this with you, she doesn't need a white knight and I wasn't attacking her one single bit.....For the record, the population of the US is roughly 330 million, 1 in 100 million would imply there are 3 women in the US that get excited being an online KH.

 

I missed the 'usually' too



I do hope its always the same person

 

Haha. Poor choice of words on my part.
Consistently the same person so far
Sometimes the hair is different.

I'm inclined to believe she's real. Even if she isn't I'm not in a position where there's deep emotional attachment and I've not been conned out of my savings. Neither of those things are likely to happen either.
I've been locking via Chastikey. It's very gamified in that community. There are plenty of people listing themselves as male/female/trans keyholders. They don't really have much reason to lie about their gender.

 

Let's not play the race card. Who says a knight need be white?

 

Fair point... They do tend to be in higher demand. The ones who advertise themselves as findoms seem have countless people locked.
Most do it for free and try to keep their numbers low.
Some of the males/trans keyholders are very high on demand though.

 

The internet is dark and full of terrors.

 

The internet really is dark and full of terrors.

I imagine the people using those are doing so for financial gain or in more elaborate attempts to blackmail people.

 

If only there was a way you could verify people over the Internet. Some kind of way to prove they are who they say they are. If we could find such a way, we should implement it here. It'd be a good thing to be able to tell who's real and who's not.

Cmon.

And as for you HusbandX. I literally linked a person talking extensively about the How's and whys they like chastity. I could literally have call on 3 different keyholders to come here and post exactly what they like about chastity and their sentiments will echo what I've said.

Care to make a wager? Would you be prepared to eat humble pie and drop the white Knight bullshit?

 

I don't care. What's your point?

If you have a point, I still don't care.

However, if such people exist, I'm sure they'd be more than welcome to do just that, so by all means, send them along.

I still won't care, however. But thanks, anyway.

 

What a big tough little coward you are. I would have thought someone so confident of their words would have been all too happy to accept my wager and take my money.

I guess you're going with the bravado and bluff route. It's very cute darling.

Now just leave it to the adults to have a discussion would you. Run along now, mommy and daddy are talking.

 

Very impressive, aren't you? Not very adult, but very impressive. Or so you think.

You try to wag your dick with talk of three mistresses. Big deal. Do you think you're impressive, and if so, to whom?

I have no doubt that the web site owner would be thrilled to have several women register and participate.

In the meantime, grow up.

 

2 of them are on this forum already. lmfao. Swing and a miss buddy.

 

Some people who have been here for a while will have interesting memories of Mascara Snake (Ms. Amanda), who fooled some of us - mostly me - for several years. I don't think he even had the good grace to buy an e-whore-pack, but he had stunning photos of his alter-ego, all of them stolen in a brazen act of identity theft.

He was having loads of fun till Mistress Lucy unmasked him.

I think that was probably the inspiration for the 'Verified Female' option. I noticed a number of long-term 'female' members of CM dropped out when it was introduced. When discussing chastity issues, FLRs, etc., it is helpful to have at least a faint grip on reality!

 

I have to admit, I don't get the `online thing' for either side...but especially for the keyholder. Outside of a relationship, it would just seem so incomplete to me. But to Lucy's point, i dont see the benefit to her in the online arrangement.

But I do believe there are women who genuinely enjoy it in real life. I'm certainly the one who introduced it in our relationship, but my wife is the one who really pushed it to the next level. She took me to the piercer and made sure it wasnt just going to be a game after a certain point. She appears to be genuinely turned on by the locked cage, but who knows? Maybe it's a pavlovian response to seeing that intimacy and the relationship is all about serving and pleasing her? Either way, the end result is the same.