Getting back to basics and the original Chastity Mansion charter

I read this and thought I need to get out of here. I've been thinking it for some time. Your clarity is spot on. This site today is less about the mechanical nature of chastity devices and more about males being cucks. It was more of a factually based placed with the occational anecdote to provide some ideas. Now i am seeing a great deal of opinion (my own included) and trolling, and time and space wasted. This site as a sort of chastity encyclopedia has become a thing of the past. You have to dig deep through this forum now to find any relevant tech info.

MS was a major distraction, and was manipulating opinion (the less usefull part of this site) all over the place. The damage done is significant. Even the yahoo acct MS had has been discontinued. That being said, I have had dark days, and through chat MS talked me out of certain points of view I was holding at the time, probably doing a large bit of good for me. I thank the flower snake for that. Full stop. nothing else.

But onto the current state where it seems being male puts you automatically in a sub category, and female supremacy cannot be questioned, I am not sure there is any room left for intellectual development. This site as an encyclopedia was best. A place where real reviews and experiences help guide a community through a kink hidden by the rest of society. What it is now, I am not sure anymore. I do know I no longer feel welcomed here, and the support that once seemed reliable is now based in lies. Too many lies.

 

There is *literally* an entire section of the forum dedicated to the mechanics and technical information about chastity devices. It's labeled, oddly enough, "Chastity Devices."

 

What the fuk. Just delete my profile.

This is the warm sense i get from you lot!

Go find your corner to sit in! Per the ex-cop! Oooooh i'd better follow that advice or ... will i be added to some list?

And generally degrading language and condescending tone from the queen herself.

 

Let me see if i understand, females are not to be discussed as objects for domination etc. ...but discussing dominating males and degrading them is fine?

 

@beck, your slowly figuring out what CM is all about.

 

@L-u-c-y you may not directly say what it is you'd prefer this site to be, but I think it is clear it is a tool for your personal ammusment. Your collection of videos etc say it all. You hold keys for self proclaimed cucks, submissives, etc until they no longer are useful to you, right?? This is your platform to monitor them, and offer them a chance to serve you is it not?Jens isn't stopping you from what i can tell, why not add your name in front of "chastity mansion" May as well make it official.

@maid_carrie -spoken like a true mod. Thank you for attempting to difuse. I appreciate you, and your effort.

I seem to have walked myself out onto the plank, beer is not the answer, and hopefully i can swim

 

5 years is pretty damn slow, isn't it???

 

I could not agree more with you. Thank you for stating and maintaining what should be obvious.

 

I’m assuming you were implying DISCUSSING dominating males and DISCUSSING degrading males, and not actually degrading males here for example.

 

Interesting word to use... degrading...
There have been several posts already mentioned which are pretty clearly degrading to women, yet I can't think of a single post I've read here which I felt was degrading to men.
May be wrong of course... just an observation.

 

I think the closest we get to derogatory talk about men are generally guys self deprecating... But in whatever way that lives up to their fantasies.

 

This is exactly why I prefer "woman" to "female". Female implies genetics, and could make our transfer sisters feel excluded or less than. I see transfer women as women, period.

 

Thanks for this, I never would have seen it that way.

 

Ugh, I meant to type *trans* stupid autocorrect.

 

Ha, love it!!

 

@mr_newbie ... I'm a self-deprecator, 3 times a day, doesn't hurt a bit. It replaced another habit I once had. It was that or cheesecake.

Mistress Lucy is correct, the site - as I read it - ought to be entirely respectful of women, to give them a voice that will be heard and appreciated, to further their interest (and ours) in the benefits of short and long-term semen retention and the conservation of male energy. There are many enlightened women who choose to use this knowledge constructively and creatively and hopefully they will find their way here once they know their thoughts, opinions and wisdom are welcome.

It doesn't have to be all about FLRs or Female Superiority, although placing a very high value on the Feminine Divine will certainly work in any relationship configuration. Especially the ones you're likely to stumble across here.

 

Its simple really in the light of recent event some people now when in any on site exchanges with a person they believe to be a woman would prefer that thew woman in question have verified that she is in fact a woman.

CM is not insisting that all women verify that they are female.

So the people that wish to only have on site exchanges with 'verified' women have that choice since some women it would seem are willing to verify their gender.

Leaving those who prefer to interact with only 'verified' women a pool of said women with which to do so. Albeit for now a very a much smaller pool this does leave you a choice ....do you interact with only 'verified' women or do you accept the gender of some on trust and include them in your personal pool of females you are willing to interact with.

Whether or not some women choose to 'verify' remains to be their choice.



The question raised is ; What is it about a person falsely portraying them self as a woman that offends you.

It is that they created an alias or pseudonym (don't most of us) to protect their identity?

Is it that they have or have attempted to deceive you as to their gender

or
Is it some of what they have actually said or done?

For me its just the lies. It certainly was with our most recently revealed by Lucy case.
I don't like being lied to. I feel able to trust thieves more than I trust liars.
But that's only my own opinion.

Time for individual reflection perhaps.

 

L-U-C-Y these are all the reasons I hesitate to ask my wife to look into/join CM. I think she could get much more comfortable with chastity if she made some friends on here, but as CM is right now it would be more like a shock factor and completely discourage her from visiting and may even discourage her from keeping me locked. I think some enforced guidelines would help bring more females or keyholder partners in. One can dream right...

As for verification, i think it would only be worth females(or keyholders if gay) verifying. And presenting an ID is absolute nonsense for those who suggested that. Who the heck would risk that? You are not sending an ID to someone you know. I think a quick live video chat would suffice. As the amount of females on here are likely very limited, this probably would be a realistic goal.

Just my 2 cents!